Comments by dax00
Name | W | D | L | P | BS | SB | Blk |
dax00 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 30 | 30 | 5 |
Carlos Cetina | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7.5 | 22.5 | 26 | 2 |
Kevin Pacey | 6 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 30 | 3 |
Fergus Duniho | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 4 |
Greg Strong | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 2 |
Adam DeWitt | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4.5 | 7 | 10.5 | 2 |
Aurelian Florea | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
John Davis | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
Jarid Carlson | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
wdtr2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Yesterday, I was issued a personal challenge that was automatically accepted. Wasn't given the option to decline invitation. Perhaps something to look into.
It's nice to hear different opinions. Perhaps I am somewhat biased due to the demolition work my Gryphon has done in the tournament game.
Where the Queen provides distributed pressure, the Gryphon provides concentrated pressure. Against reasonable play, where you expect your opponent to try to make his pieces work together (reasonable to assume pieces are relatively close together), I assert that the Gryphon is a better piece for pressuring the opponent overall. Even when kicked away, it can often still maintain distant defense. And the forking potential is massive.
I was never one to subscribe to a calculatory method of evaluating piece values, rather in favor of practical analysis through actual play.
Even if I were to concede that a Gryphon is about a pawn less in worth than a Queen on an 8×8 board (which I do not), it makes sense that the Gryphon's initial diagonal move would mitigate its strength more so on the smaller board than on the 12×12 board of Metamachy, so for this game its value should be at least comparable if not superior.
Pretty sure I prefer the Eagle over a Queen. So much versatility.
Must be early. Still can't access any active timed games
As long as White wins in Metamachy get credit towards the "Black wins" tiebreaker, I have no further objection.
The whites/blacks for Metamachy seem to have been incorrectly assigned.
1. skip;
1... k h7-g12; l e7-f12; g f7-g11; q g7-f11
2. P f3-f5
2... p g10-g8
3. P f5-f7
3... p g8-g6
4. P f7-g8
The Metamachy preset still allows illegal en passants. This shouldn't really be a problem, since it's doubtful that anyone would even attempt to play such a move, but still...
Time controls are shown right above the "Accept" button.
So, after two rounds of play, the current tournament results are:
[Pos) Name, Pts, #Wins, BS, SB, Black wins]
- Kevin Pacey, 5.5, 5, 11, 13.25, 3;
- dax00, 5, 5, 11.5, 11.5, 2;
- Carlos Cetina, 4.5, 4, 8, 10.75, 2;
- Fergus Duniho, 4, 4, 9, 9, 3;
- Greg Strong, 4, 4, 6, 6, 1;
- Adam DeWitt, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1;
- Jarid Carlson, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1;
- Aurelian Florea & wdtr2 & John Davis, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0.
It seems logical to me that stalemate must be a result of one player's move making it impossible for the other player to complete his move(s). Intentionally "stalemating" yourself on your first move so you have no legal second move seems like it should be illegal - an illegal move. If left with any set of 2 legal moves to be played, a player should be compelled to make those moves.
If, for example, a player can only move his pawn, that pawn starts on b7, and an enemy pawn is on b4, that player should not be allowed to make the pawn double-move on move 1, but rather make 2 separate single-square moves.
I noticed that all your games of this sort forbid 4 consecutive checks for some reason. Is this a misunderstanding of the repetition rule of historical (and current) shogi variants, which forbids fourfold repetition of a position with check, or is this intentionally something different?
King 2-space leap appears to be in order. All legal en passant captures can be made. However, one is still allowed to make incorrect en passant captures.
For example, if a white pawn is on c4 and a black pawn on d5, if White plays c4-c6, the preset still allows Black (incorrectly) to take d5-c4 en passant, removing the pawn on c6.
New Metamachy rule-enforcing preset: After brief testing of en passant and initial king move...
I was unable to make any en passant captures using white pawns on ranks 6, 7, and 8. I was able to make normal en passant captures with white pawns on ranks 4 and 5. More interestingly, I was able to make illegal en passant captures with white pawns on ranks 4 and 5. By illegal, I mean that: a black pawn that can be captured normally by a white pawn makes a double-move; White on his next turn is allowed to take that pawn en passant illegally. I was able to make legal en passant captures with black pawns on all squares tested. I was also able to make the illegal en passant captures with black pawns on all squares.
The initial king 2-square move doesn't seem to work.
Will keep testing...
It looks as though Round 2 is nearly about to draw to a close. Any idea when the rule-enforcing presets for Metamachy and Symmetric Chess will be ready for us?
I would also like clarification about the promotion rules. The way I interpreted the rule as you wrote it, promotion to queen would be mandatory if you didn't have one, otherwise mandatory promotion to wildebeest. Which bothered me, because in my current game with Greg Strong, in one quite possible line, I would prefer wildebeest to queen. Underpromotion is a great mechanic, so it would be nice to be able to promote to lesser pieces if desired.
Since this comment is for a page that has not been published yet, you must be signed in to read it.
20 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.