Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Later Reverse Order Earlier
The Game of the Three Kingdoms. inese Chess for three players (Game of the Three Kingdoms). (Cells: 135) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
A. M. DeWitt wrote on Mon, Oct 25, 2021 02:54 PM UTC:

What if there was a two player version? Or I could just make one myself...

Jacob Eugenio wrote on Thu, Apr 15, 2021 07:40 AM UTC:

Is there a type of game online? or here?

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Apr 18, 2010 12:27 PM UTC:
These extra pieces looks like some 'mao variant of camel'!

Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 10:20 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks to David Howe, the mistake has been corrected. This page is now correct, my previous message are not relevant anymore.

Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Thu, Mar 12, 2009 12:09 PM UTC:Poor ★
There is a big mistake, coming from Stephen Leary's Xiangqi FAQ which was confused on that point: this game is not The Game of Three Kingdoms.
It is the Game of Three Friends, Sanyou Qi.

Charles Gilman wrote on Sat, Sep 15, 2007 06:46 AM UTC:
I've just noticed (because it turns up on the 45-cell filter) that this is marked as a 45-cell variant, rather than a 135-cell one.

Kwan wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2005 03:54 PM UTC:
one more question, do u win by defeating the other two? or one wins after
one defeated one or another. if that's so the game could be quite
since u can't attack boldly on oneself,(for the other might attack you)
and if u can't attack boldly and make good moves, it's no fun about

anyways don't quite understand how this works, ...sigh

Ether wrote on Mon, Jun 7, 2004 03:57 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Just to respond to previous posts:
The mid triangle section is just like the river in a regular 1-on-1 game.
Meaning it's possible to check both opponents at the same time (or any
other moves). I guess it would be less confusing if the lines that made
the triangles are done with dotted lines instead of solid lines. So
basically no pieces would ever actually land on any 'points' within the
big triangle.
And to win the game, you would have to beat both opponents.
When I was little, I used to team with my younger brother and play
our dad and it was a good learning experience.

ltlee1 wrote on Thu, Feb 6, 2003 11:44 AM UTC:Poor ★
No enough firing power on a large chessbroad.

Randy wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 07:01 AM UTC:
How do u win? Is it by capturing both players OR by defeating one? i.e. If the player to your left is captured, u win. If the player to your right is aptured, the player on the left wins, so in this case, u not only have to guard yourself but a play a part by maintaing the equilibirium of power (just like during the 3 kingdoms).

Sam wrote on Sun, Jul 7, 2002 09:34 PM UTC:Poor ★
Please tell how the pieces would move in the triangle spaces, for example the knight. Also, is there a river? can the elephant become an attacker? Please tell us. Thanks for your time.

11 comments displayed

Later Reverse Order Earlier

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.