Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

LatestLater Reverse Order Earlier
Rose Chess XII. With Nightriders, (Half-)Roses, Spotted Gryphons and War Machines. (12x12, Cells: 144) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Jörg Knappen wrote on Sun, May 23, 2021 11:37 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from 09:40 PM:

Ah yes, I see, it is a halfling Rose indeed!


H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, May 23, 2021 09:40 PM UTC in reply to Jörg Knappen from 09:21 PM:

Nice to see the Spotted Gryphon in this diagram, it is another difficult piece to describe!

Indeed. Before I had introduced the paretheses notation, it would have been necessary to mention every distance separately, with a large number of intermediate steps.

I understood from the article that in this variant the Rose only has 4 steps.


Jörg Knappen wrote on Sun, May 23, 2021 09:21 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from 08:30 PM:

Shouldn't the Rose have the move qN8 (including a zero move if the full circle is available) instead of just qN4? In the starting position after

  1. k4-k5 ... it should be possible to play 2. Of2-f6.

Nice to see the Spotted Gryphon in this diagram, it is another difficult piece to describe!


H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, May 23, 2021 08:30 PM UTC:
satellite=rose files=12 ranks=12 graphicsDir=http://www.chessvariants.com/graphics.dir/alfaeriePNG35/ promoZone=2 maxPromote=1 squareSize=35 graphicsType=png lightShade=#FFFFCF startShade=#70B79F rimColor=#0F1090 coordColor=#EFEF1F borders=0 firstRank=1 useMarkers=1 promoChoice=!P,Q,S,O,H,R,B,W,N pawn::::b4-k4 war machine::WH:scout:d2,i2 knight:N:::d3,i3 bishop::::e3,h3 rook::::c3,j3 nightrider:H:NN::g2 spotted gryphon::Fafspmaf(afpmaf)4F:gryphon:b2,k2 rose:O:qN4::f2 queen::::f3 king::KisO2::g3

Rose Chess XII


Georg Spengler wrote on Sun, Jan 4, 2015 07:43 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
Innovative choice of pieces. Theoretically they fit well with each other. But game play turnsout to be rather awkward.

5 comments displayed

LatestLater Reverse Order Earlier

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.