Snark or not, I agree with H.G. that this is entirely too much art for a piececlopedia page. If you wanted to get feedback on the various outputs you've generated (to decide on one or two for the page), that should've been done in comments.
I have to agree here, at least in principle. No more than three or four AI illos should be present on a Piececlopedia page, and even that many only when there are that many different versions to help with people's inventiveness (or that many different representations of the piece, as is the case with he Carpenter / Templar / Doughnut / Yar*). In this case, I'd suggest keeping the full-figure centaur and the two that I pointed out.
Even so, I wouldn't object to "Art Gallery" pages being a part of this site, similar to the Craft and Photo pages.
*The Yar is out of my Tifinagh set, and so technically counts as my own invention, though it does have the same move pattern as the other three and so counts for these purposes.
I have to agree here, at least in principle. No more than three or four AI illos should be present on a Piececlopedia page, and even that many only when there are that many different versions to help with people's inventiveness (or that many different representations of the piece, as is the case with he Carpenter / Templar / Doughnut / Yar*). In this case, I'd suggest keeping the full-figure centaur and the two that I pointed out.
Even so, I wouldn't object to "Art Gallery" pages being a part of this site, similar to the Craft and Photo pages.
*The Yar is out of my Tifinagh set, and so technically counts as my own invention, though it does have the same move pattern as the other three and so counts for these purposes.