I respect your conclusions about Chess flaws. I disagree with some of them,
I have not a clearly thought position about a few, and I may agree with
other points, but, generally, I am sure other people can have another
opinions, perfectly valid as yours, because there is much subjective
appretiation inmerse, so I accept your opinions as yours and of all who
may completely agree with you, but not as an absolute conclusion. My
position: Game design is an artistic manifestation. There are not such
things as 'Good design' or 'Bad design'. These concepts are, as much,
statistical, according to appretiation of majorities. To the rest,
'Good' or 'Bad' are absolutelly personal opinions about a single
artistic design.