Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
shimmin wrote on Sat, Sep 7, 2002 03:03 AM UTC:
On the machines issue. Yeah, you can play against Zillions any time you want, but let's face it, Zillions may be a better-than-nothing opponent, but it's not a very good opponent. If someone had an engine that was both good and flexible, I wouldn't object to playing it. <p> But on a practical note, there's the Turing issue: how do you know whether your opponent is a machine or not? Playing a novice human can be just as dull as playing an uninspired program; and Fritz will kick your flesh-and-blood skills just as soundly as any grandmaster. And over email, you have no clue whether the 'person' who's sending you the next move is doing so from their own thought, from the machine's generation, or from some combination of the two. <p> Since there's no way to enforce the rule, why make it a rule at all? All the rule will mean is that some less-than-honest humans might go around feeling vaguely guilty that they fed a chess position into the machine for help, and some programmer will have to enter their engine under human guise to see how it performs against human beings. Why bother with the pretense at all? Let humans honestly be humans, and let machines honestly be machines. <p> Of course, some people object to playing versus machines, and since this is a matter of recreation, such prejudices may as well be humored. Why not allow machines to enter, declared as machines, and allow contestants who don't want to play them be excluded from all pairings involving a machine.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Multivariant Tournament 2003

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.