Diamond Chess 306

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND MISSION STATEMENT

I have spent about three years working on DIAMOND CHESS 306. It is inspired by Parachess (invented in 2002 by Tony Paletta) and Assimilation Fusion Chess (invented in 2001 by Fergus Duniho). Several years back, I fell in love with the Parachess board and judged it worthy of further exploration. At about the same time, I developed a fascination with a number of Fergus Duniho's games, in which chess pieces may be combined with other pieces (both friends and captured enemies) to create new pieces, which can themselves be disassembled again into their components. So I gratefully acknowledge my debt to Tony Paletta for the design of the board and for many of the pieces, and to Fergus Duniho for the idea of capturing and assimilating the powers of pieces. I have also borrowed a few ideas from Hexagonal Chess.

Setup

I have expanded Tony Paletta's original 72-cell board to 306 cells. In addition to the three paths that he defined (the edge path, diagonal path, and wave path), I have defined an oblique path, which resembles the path taken by a Bishop in many variants of Hexagonal Chess.

Pieces

The pieces used in Diamond Chess 306 come from several different sources:

1. Pieces borrowed from Tony Paletta's Parachess, with names and values unchanged: Rook, Princess, Duchess, Queen, Archer, Knight, Sorcerer, Monk, Warlord, Zealot, Yeoman.
2, Pieces borrowed from Parachess, with names changed : Astronaut (originally called the Bishop; a piece of my own - which is more similar to its FIDE counterpart, is now called the Bishop.
3. Pieces borrowed from Parachess, with values changed : Bishop, Overlord, Lieutenant, Cardinal, King, Pawn
4. Pieces borrowed from Hexagonal Chess, with names changed : Spy (it resembles the BISHOP in many Hexagonal Chess variants).
5. Pieces that I have invented specifically for Diamond Chess 306 : Bishop, Lance, Spy, Countess, Judge, Nomad, Conqueror, Airman, Sailor, Friar, Priest, Chaplain, Minister, Regent, Herald, Courier, Paratrooper, Bomber, Assassin, Metropolitan, Hermit, Primate, Archbishop, Pope, Patriarch, Caliph, Crusader.

Apart from the King (a standalone piece, unable to merge with any other piece), pieces are grouped into four "families" - sliders, leapers, crooked pieces, and pawns. Pieces may merge with other pieces of the same "family" to form more complex pieces, which may subsequently be disassembled into their components. This is done by capturing an enemy piece, whose powers are absorbed by the capturing piece, or by fusing with a friendly piece by moving one piece onto another friendly piece, as though it were an enemy piece. To break a complex piece down into its components, move one component away onto an empty cell. This is done, in the Zillions program, by clicking on an empty cell with the mouse. A simple component on a compound piece will move there, leaving the rest of the piece behind. For example, a Duchess (a combination of the Rook and the Lance) may be divided as follows : clicking on an empty cell along a rook-path from the Lance will create a Rook on the designated cell, leaving a Lance where the Duchess was.

Pieces may merge only with pieces of the same "family." Thus the Duchess (a Rook-Lance compound) is possible, but a Rook-Knight compound is not.

I have taken Fergus Duniho's ideas a step further. In his games, only simple pieces may merge with other simple pieces. I wanted a game that would be a bit wilder, so in Diamond Chess 306, compound pieces may also merge with other compound pieces.

Rules

SPECIAL RULES 1. When a compound piece is captured by a simple piece which is identical to one of its components, the capturing piece simple absorbs the additional values and is converted into the compound piece. For example, a Rook capturing a Duchess (Rook + Lance) simply absorbs the additional powers of the Lance, converting into a Duchess. Pieces may only absorb the powers of enemy pieces in this way. To allow the above example between friendly pieces would involve sacrificing a Rook. The same principle applies to Rule number 2, below.

2. When a compound piece captures another compound piece, it simply absorbs any additional values that the other piece may have. For example, a Duchess (Rook + Lance) capturing a Princess (Rook + Bishop) becomes a Queen.

3. When a compound piece captures a simple piece, the latter is simply killed and removed from the board.

Notes

I have programmed a Zillions of Games file to play this game. You may download it here. You need the Zillions of Games engine installed to play it.

* Free distribution of this game is permitted - and, in fact, encouraged - for any noncommercial purpose.

* You have Zillions experience? Feel free to optimise the code, correct any bugs, create variants for this game, or even use ideas (including code) from this program in games of your own. You may email me with suggestions. If I use your suggestions in future editions, I will acknowledge you.

This 'user submitted' page is a collaboration between the posting user and the Chess Variant Pages. Registered contributors to the Chess Variant Pages have the ability to post their own works, subject to review and editing by the Chess Variant Pages Editorial Staff.

By David Cannon.
Web page created: 2009-02-04. Web page last updated: 2010-06-26

Comments

Diamond Chess 306. Missing description (22x24, Cells: 306)

David Cannon wrote on 2010-07-03 UTC

The short answer is no. The Princess belongs to the 'slider' family and the Zealot to the 'crooked slider' family. The Lance shares membership of both families and can therefore be assimilated by members of either family - as a simple piece. But when it is part of a compound, it can be assimilated only by members of the same family. Therefore, a Princess cannot assimilate the Lance part of the Zealot to become a Queen.

You may ask why this fussy distinction. There are two reasons. The first is that I could either allow every piece to assimilate every other piece, or I would have to draw the line somewhere. The first option would create such a huge number of pieces that even I wouldn't be able to remember them all. The second option, which I chose, means that some arbitrary distinctions have to be made. I settled on confining assimilation to within 'families' - and in the case of families whose membership partially overlaps, a certain degree of subjectivity creeps in.

The second reason for this is programming. There were a number of things I would have liked to do, but the limitations of Zillions (or, rather, of my knowledge of it) forced compromises. The case you mentioned is one, although I think I would now be able to work around it if I was so inclined. I may may tweak the program that way when I get around to it.

New question: Does a Princess that captures a Zealot absorb the Lance part to become a Queen?

dcannon1965 wrote on 2010-06-27 UTC

No, what I meant was that when a compound piece captures a simple piece that forms one of its components, it cannot assimilate it. A Duchess (a Rook-Lance compound) capturing a Bishop does indeed become a Queen. But a Duchess capturing a Rook simply kills the Rook: it already has the Rook's powers, so gaining the Rook doesn't give it anything it hasn't already got.

Thanks for drawing my attention to this - I think I need to make some further revisions to the instructions:-(

> 3. When a compound piece captures a simple piece, the latter is simply
killed and removed from the board.

So, Duchess takes Bishop doesn't become a Queen?

David Cannon wrote on 2010-06-19 UTC

This page looks like a dog's breakfast at the moment. I am in the middle of rewriting it and replacing the graphics with more cosmetic ones; will try to finish tomorrow.

Number of ratings: 2, Average rating: Average, Number of comments: 23