Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Rated Comments for a Single Item

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Xiangqi: Chinese Chess. Links and rules for Chinese Chess (Xiangqi). (9x10, Cells: 90) (Recognized!)[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
dsvgsd wrote on Mon, Mar 3, 2003 09:50 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Charles Gilman wrote on Sun, Mar 9, 2003 11:06 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
This is an interesting variant, but it is weakened by the fact that similar pieces on a side start on similar 'colours'. A way of solving this while keeping close to the original would be to increase to ten files to match the ranks, with 4-file-wide palaces. The general could replaced by a standard King and a capturable Wazir, both still confined to the fortress. Both middle files would have Chinese pawns. A further improvement would be allowing the elephants to capture en route.

Travis wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 03:14 AM UTC:Poor ★
Could you please tell the point value of each piece. Such as in Western Chess were the queen is worth 9 points and so on.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 05:42 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Travis: what happens if no one knows them? anyway, Xiangqi is a pretty nice classic game.

Travis wrote on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 02:46 AM UTC:Poor ★
I believe sombody has to know the point values, because Chinese Chess is the oldest form of chess.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, May 26, 2003 04:23 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Zdeno wrote on Sat, Aug 23, 2003 08:34 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
Hue liako gojuik ask mail [email protected] . Kopta liu ertunduji eh djd Zdeno. Chess ji playing long time. [email protected]

hi wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2003 05:26 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Sep 7, 2003 05:04 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

pitstone wrote on Mon, Sep 8, 2003 04:56 PM UTC:Poor ★
I do not play for a very long time. That is why I rated myself poor.

Chen wrote on Fri, Sep 26, 2003 12:51 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
The Cannons are the most interesting and difficult to use pieces in
Xiangqi, and add much to the tactical potential of the game. The earliest
versions of Xiangqi did not have the Cannons (gunpower was not invented
back then), which made them much less tactically interesting than modern
Xiangqi. Without the Cannons, one's attacking potential is a lot
smaller.
Cannons improved Xiangqi in a similar way to how the increased powers of
the Queen improved Chess. Cannons were added to Chinese Chess during the
Song Dynasty (960 - 1279 AD) when gunpower based weapons were first used.


The Cannon is a great Chinese invention (both on and off the Xiangqi
board!). The Cannon as a chess piece is unique to Chinese Chess and
variants derived from its lineage. (Such as Korean chess) If the primary
European contribution to chess games is the invention of the powerful
Queen, and the Japanese contribution is the invention of rules which
allow
one to use captured pieces as his/her own, then the Cannon, I believe, is
the major Chinese contribution to the chess family of games. This piece
combines the long-range mobility of line pieces and the penetrating power
of leapers. It can strike at the opponent's positions from a distance
like a Rook and penetrate through defensive lines to attack pieces behind
them like a Knight. Rooks have long-range attack ability but can be
obstructed easily with well defended pieces in their line of sight.
Knights can 'see through' the opponent's defenses but can only attack
from close range, where itself is often vulnerable. The Cannon combines
the advantages of both line pieces and leapers in its attack. 

Tactically speaking, the interesting thing about the Cannon is that it is
the only chess piece that can pin TWO pieces at the same time. This also
means discovered attacks involving the Cannons can be more unpredictable.
Two pieces in front of the Cannon have the potential to move off for the
Cannon to strike at the opponent (With other chess pieces, only one piece
would have this potential). When the Cannons double up to form a battery,
their advantage over the Rooks is that they can directly strike two
positions at once, with the Cannon at the rear using its companion in
front as its screen, where the doubled Rooks can only attack one point.

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Fri, Sep 26, 2003 05:17 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
Very interesting comments. I have to admit that I have not easily adapted to cannons, but your observations will make me take a fresh look at them. Thanks, Chen.

vivian yang wrote on Mon, Sep 29, 2003 10:07 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

vivian yang wrote on Sun, Oct 5, 2003 05:38 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

random wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 04:52 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
It's pretty good. Do you have the rules of Chinese Chess that Korean people play with? If you do, that'll be great!

Bjorn wrote on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 06:06 AM UTC:Poor ★
How to Download the game Xiangqi

benjamin wrote on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 02:20 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
You discribe the stuff very good.

jdgdfgfh wrote on Thu, Jan 8, 2004 04:32 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Error wrote on Sun, Jan 11, 2004 08:43 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
can i copy the texts here to my homepage?
i will claim the texts are copied from 'www.chessvariants.com' in my HP
ng goi ar.....

guando wrote on Mon, Jan 12, 2004 04:29 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Jan 12, 2004 05:22 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

i r dumb wrote on Tue, Jan 13, 2004 04:35 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Seongmo Yoon wrote on Tue, Feb 3, 2004 06:19 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks, John!

This is from another source 
I can use this and your reference to know of Chinese chess notation.

>>From what I remember Lau just used a straightforward translation of 
>>the Chinese move notation which has been used for a long time. If you
>>have in Chinese language books you can verify this.
> 
> 
> I don't have Chinese books (as I unfortunately don't read Chinese);
but
> Lau used a pure algebraic notation.  The standard notation uses a 
> system with the symbols +, -, = to denote moves forward, back, or side-
> ward.  Lau's notation is actually easier to follow but no one else uses
it,
> so the student has to discard it and learn the standard notation later.

He simply uses english characters to represent the same thing.  From 
what I could tell his notation is easily translatable into [WA]XF by 
replacing f,b,t with +,-,=.  I may have the characters wrong, but in 
general he uses the Chinese notation with english characters just as 
[WA]XF uses chinese notation with mathematical symbols.

You should learn the characters needed to read chinese notation.  Its 
really only a few symbols more than the pieces.  You have front, back, 
side, and the numbers 1-9.

DMN wrote on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 04:05 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
It is a good start for beginners in understanding one of the greatest
game,
in my opinion, ever created. As to the question of Seongmo Yoon, the
website with those free e-books on Chinese Chess requires a program
called
Adobe Acrobat to view. You can find the software free to download almost
anywhere on the internet, just search for the program through google or
you can probably find it on Download.com. It was a great site for would
be
chinese chess players...highly recommended:
http://wxf.hypermart.net/eg/index.html
Thanx Seongmo Yoon. hopes this comment helps.

Larson wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2004 06:51 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
IS there a way for you to include link to the online multiplayer 3D Chinese
chess game I created?

http://chess.hanamifx.com/

25 comments displayed

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.