Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Xiangqi: Chinese Chess. Links and rules for Chinese Chess (Xiangqi). (9x10, Cells: 90) (Recognized!)[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
willem wrote on Wed, Apr 3, 2002 07:07 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Mar 6, 2002 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Very useful and informative. Thanks for your effort.

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Jan 9, 2002 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks for the initial overview of this unknown game. I hadn't heard of Chinese Chess until tonight and simple curiousity sent me to your website. Now...I just want to play! With appreciation, tt

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Jan 1, 2002 12:00 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Kim wrote on Sun, Aug 5, 2001 12:00 AM UTC:
Informative overview for the newcomer to Xiangqi, however, the descriptions
assume the reader is already familiar with regular chess.
Kim, Cape Town, South Africa

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Jun 4, 2001 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Tue, May 8, 2001 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Make sure you add something about who made/created it and what year it was created.

Dave Woo wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 12:00 AM UTC:
Hi:

The statement that 'You cannot put the opponent in check more than 3 times
in a row with the same piece without either side moving any other piece' is
incorrect.  Rather than the number of checks being limited, it's the number
of repeating 'cycles' (which is three cycles, or a triple-repetition, which
in most cases, six checks).

This common misconception seems to stem from Lau's book, Chinese Chess.  We
would be glad to discuss with you further on this issue.  My e-mail is
[email protected]


Dave Woo
Chinese Chess Institute
USA

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
very good

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Dec 5, 2000 12:00 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
it took me at least 15 mininutes to complete download of this website. So far, not finish yet. Thanks

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Sep 5, 2000 12:00 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Vibhi van Wersch wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 10:06 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I have come to learn the werstern version of chess since i was 6 years old.
From that time on, i have allways felt a passion for the game. Knowing that
there is more than one version of this game, it inspired me to think widely
and come up with other forms and variants of this brilliant game. One can
experiment with the numbers of squares, the forms of squares (how about a
great triagle, with three parties?), the number of pieces, the movements of
those pieces, and even swapping movement capabilities (how about giving the
Bishop the capability to jump like a knight, every other turn - after each
time you have made a move with that piece, its movement-ability changes
from knight to Bishop, from Bishop to Knight and so on...)I am glad to see
there are people who have taken the time and the effort to do research as
to where the game of chess has its origins. It is now commonly believed
that not chines chess, but chaturanga is the oldest known form of chess.
Its an Indian game. I will compare it with chinese chess, and hope many
others will share the same passion.

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Apr 28, 2002 07:06 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
This page is better than excellent! It is so specific and even has the traditional characters in chinese. I would have enjoyed it more if there were pronunciations to them but this is good enough. I never knew there was a modernized version of it and it surprised me to know that not only english-speaking people are interested in learning the chinese chess. Now I know that everyone can learn how to play it, even people who speak an entirely different language from english or chinese.

hopper for sexyness wrote on Wed, Jun 5, 2002 12:34 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
This was a superb site! I unfourtunatley can not give you an Excellent on it because well, I am doing a Chinese Report on Chinese Chess and it has to be 3 pages long. It can be doubled spaced though so I do not think you give enough info because I only got 2 pages! Can you please put more info on it though? Well I will come and check next week. Thanks Thanx

Sarah Timback wrote on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 05:51 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I am a big Chinese chess fan. I think it is great that you so have so many different chess boards at this site. This board looks very rare in America. Sometime I would to play Chinese chess. It looks complicated but easy at the same time.

Sam wrote on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 11:29 PM UTC:
You give a very little to zero amount of history about this game. You could tell where the chinese came up with the idea of a cannon.

No-one wrote on Sun, Jun 30, 2002 07:28 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

evan wrote on Mon, Jul 1, 2002 11:44 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
sam from 2002/06/27. If you aint happy with this site dont winge about it. constructive critisicm is good. If you can do better go ahead. <p>I personally believe this site is superb. Great work to all the people who put it together.

David Howe wrote on Sat, Jul 6, 2002 05:58 PM UTC:
Sam, please provide references when you make a claim that our information is incorrect. I will be deleting comments which are offhand, unsupported statements of disagreement. Thanks!

Dan wrote on Sun, Jul 7, 2002 09:11 PM UTC:
I can prove that chess originated in china. First China is a nation that likes to be isolated. Also Indian scolarers have said that the first sign of chess was around the six century A.D. Chinese soclarers have had it in the record book that the first game of chess was invented in the second century B.C. Indian soclarers have said that chinese chess isn't chess because it is played on the points and it has a river, so it isn't chess. I say if you eat a choclate cake and you eat a banna cake, they are both cakes even though they taste different. Make it clear, India did not invent chess first, china did. Also then how come, chess reached Japan if the Indian's and Europeans didn't discover it so soon? China is right next to Korea and Japan. I rest my case.

Sam wrote on Mon, Jul 8, 2002 06:00 PM UTC:Poor ★
I found a mistake on your page. The elephant can only reach 7 spaces on the board. Your site saids 8. Just trying to help you out. <p><i>Fixed. Thanks for pointing out the error. --Ed.</i>

Andrew wrote on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 01:01 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
Highly informative and with good links to further information on both xiangchi and janggi. Thank you for your time and effort.

Joey S. wrote on Thu, Aug 8, 2002 03:31 AM UTC:Poor ★
Ijust got a chinese chess set from my sister so I tried how to figure out how to play but this website didn't explain to me well enough so I could actually play.

Sam wrote on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 01:46 PM UTC:
I think Dan has made a good point and that this site should be changed to tell the right information. After all it makes sense.

Jianying Ji wrote on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 08:20 PM UTC:
It seems to me that the elephant in xiangqi (on the blackside) is
most likely and almost certainly an import from india since china
has no elephants. the character used on the black side is that of 
elephant which would be quite strange if it originated in china. so
certainly that perticular character and that piece must have come after
contact with india. 

The cannon piece almost certainly originated in china, since
china invented gun powder quite early on.

Also the different symbols on each side almost hint that it might be 
different army game once, with different powers on the sides, though
there might have been a more prosaic reason, that all the pieces have
different symbols between the sides since the original pieces were carved
and the only way to tell the sides were the characters. (red and black
came later)

And finally, since it is the elephant (xiang) that gives name to the 
whole game, that is if translated directly word for word xiangqi would
be elephant boardgame (qi having being derived from weiqi) and that 
elephants only known in china after contact with india, it is very likely
that modern xiangqi derives from indian source.

Smitty wrote on Fri, Aug 23, 2002 06:16 AM UTC:Poor ★
Good try but not informative enough.
A person that know NUTS about chinese
won't know what you are implying.

Horse/ Knight in chinese is 'ma' NOT 'mao'.

Cheers!

Sam wrote on Fri, Aug 30, 2002 12:54 AM UTC:Poor ★
Notice you say the word points to describe where you put the pieces to play. Under Geometry A line has an infity number of points. Maybe you should use the word intersections to make it much easyer to understand where you place the pieces.

Robin wrote on Fri, Aug 30, 2002 11:58 AM UTC:
Holy nitpick, Batman!

Sam wrote on Wed, Sep 4, 2002 12:11 AM UTC:
I helped to make this page better but my name has not gone down on a thank you list. For example I pointed out that the elephant could only hit 7 spaces on the board. Your site said 8. You did change it and I did get a thank you but my name is no where on the page. If no body was thanked and recongazed then there would be no point to point out the mistakes on your page. I just want to give an idea.

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Sep 4, 2002 11:25 AM UTC:
Sam, it's hard to recognize someone who won't even reveal his or her complete name. <p>A list of recognized contributors to the Chess Variants Pages can be found at http://www.chessvariants.com/index/personq.php

Sam Zimmermann wrote on Thu, Sep 5, 2002 12:40 AM UTC:
My full name is Sam Zimmermann. Now can you please add it to your list. Thank you very much.

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Nov 13, 2002 01:25 PM UTC:
How to play Chinese chess

Ghost wrote on Sun, Nov 24, 2002 02:51 AM UTC:
i wanna play xiangqi online wif other pple. but seems like it is hard to find. wat 2 do??? sien ah... so can u all pls tell mi where can i play. thanx.

Ghost wrote on Sun, Nov 24, 2002 02:52 AM UTC:
be back next week.

Ben Good wrote on Sun, Nov 24, 2002 02:55 AM UTC:
a good place to play xiangqi by email is on richard's play-by-email server, all you need is an email account and it's free, and you should always be able to find opponents. <P> http://www.gamerz.net/pbmserv/

tran wrote on Sun, Nov 24, 2002 01:03 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

yahoolian2 wrote on Thu, Dec 5, 2002 05:38 AM UTC:
Play xiangqi at <a href=http://www.clubxiangqi.com/>http://www.clubxiangqi.com/</a><br>Free and easy to use. Click Register on the website.

Javier wrote on Fri, Dec 6, 2002 09:40 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
Good sites about XiangQi in English are hard to find.  Here's a collection
of essential web-sites and programs for XiangQi.

------------------
RULES/INTRODUCTION

http://www.chessvariants.com/xiangqi.html 
Overall summary

http://www.chessvariants.com/chinfaq.html 
rec.games.chinese-chess FAQ

http://www.crockford.com/chess/xiangqi.html 
Introduction for chess players

http://www.ishipress.com/cc-rules.htm 
Sam Sloan's introduction

http://www.yutopian.com/go/ccLes/ccLes.html 
Yutopian's introduction

http://www.xmission.com/~gastown/afi/ch_index.htm 
Chinese & Korean chess

http://www.chesshub.com/cchess/tutorial/ 
Chesshub.com tutorial

http://www.chesshub.com/cchess/rules/ 
Chesshub.com Asian rules

http://www.acs.sch.edu.sg/acs_indep/eca/clubs/chinese_chess/guide.html 
Playing Guide

ftp://weber.ucsd.edu/pub/dmckiern/XiangQi.pdf 
Essentials of Chinese & Korean Chess

http://www.yutopian.com/chinesechess/chrules.pdf 
Basics of Chinese Chess

http://www.cchess.com/rules/rules.htm 
Chinese Chess Net

http://home1.gte.net/res1bup4/chess_intro.htm
Introduction by Peter Donnelly

---------------------
TUTORIAL AND STRATEGY

http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/orient/xianglearn.html 
MSO World - 6 pages

http://library.thinkquest.org/12255/universal.htm 
with Java - highly recommended!

http://www.geocities.com/yccheok/tutorial/menu.html 
with Java - online only

--------------------
SOFTWARE COLLECTIONS

http://www.nchess.com/

http://www.geocities.com/yccheok/software.html

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/software/software.htm

PLAYING SOFTWARE

http://www.zillionsofgames.com/games/chinesechess-fd.html 
http://www.zillionsofgames.com/games/chinesechesswesternstyle.html
Zillions of Games

http://www.geocities.com/xqlearner/ 
http://xqlearner.ibid.com.cn (mirror site)
Chinese Chess Learner 
Shareware playing/database - value: excellent

http://www.nchess.com/cccmain.htm 
Coffee Chinese Chess Ver 0.4 java applet 
simple - value: good)

http://www.cc-xiexie.com
http://www.geocities.com/yccheok/software/xiexie.zip 
XieXie 
Strong playing program - value: excellent

http://www.geocities.com/yccheok/software/miloches.zip 
Milo's Chinese Chess 
2D and 3D - value: good

http://cosoft.org.cn/project/showfiles.php?group_id=100 
Mantis Chess Ver. 1.04 
Tiny GNU program - value: average

------------------------
EDITOR/DATABASE SOFTWARE

http://tysung.hypermart.net/cchview/m1.htm 
CChView Ver 3.5.0 
Get disk 1 from xiangqi.rm-f.net/disk1.zip - value: good

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/software/cchview/help/main.htm
CChView 4.3.5 - value: excellent

http://www.nchess.com/xb.html 
XB Database Browser ver 1.1
Browsing only - value: good

http://www.nchess.com/eon.htm 
Endgame database viewer Of xiaNqi 
For evaluating end-games - value: average

http://www.nchess.com/ccwsetup.zip 
Chinese Chess World Ver 0.1
Trainer program with computer play - value: average

-----
GAMES

http://www.nchess.com/download.html 
Masters games

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/index.html 
Xiangqi Master Database - huge collection

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/software/cchview/help/main.htm
Xiangqi Master Database - for CChView 4.3.5

http://xiangqi.rm-f.net/index.html 
Xiangqi Opening Studies

--------------------------------		
SERVERS REQUIRING GENERIC CLIENT (ICCS = Internet Chinese Chess Servers)

http://xiangqi.com/ 
World Xiangqi League - site being revised

telnet chess.homeylife.net 5555 (active!)
Note: register by logging on with your chosen user handle, 
and when logged on type: 'register youremailaddress'

-------------------
GENERIC ICCS client 

http://icompile.hypermart.net/xiangqi/ccctwin.htm 
CCCT Ver. 1.85 for ICCS - recommended! 

http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Cave/7230/coolclient01.zip 
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Cave/7230/coolclient02.zip 
Cool Client Ver 1.1 for ICCS disk 1 & 2

---------------------------------
SERVERS REQUIRING SPECIFIC CLIENT

http://www.chesssky.net/eindex.htm 
Movesky XiangQi
http://www.chesssky.net/edownload.htm 
MoveSky XiangQi client
Note: www.movesky.net is their old URL

http://www.cchess.com/english-index.html 
CChess.com Chinese Chess Net
http://www.cchess.com/download/englishdownload.html 
CChess.com client Ver. 4.5.8
Note: some parts of inteface are in Chinese, seems deserted

------------		
JAVA SERVERS

http://www.clubxiangqi.com/ 
Club XiangQi - most active/recommended

http://www.chesshub.com 
Chess Hub - active - apparently $12 a year

http://library.thinkquest.org/12255/universal.htm 
seems deserted?

---------------------
PLAY BY EMAIL SERVERS

http://www.itsyourturn.com 
slow play over several days

http://www.gamerz.net/pbmserv/
Play By Email Server

-----------------------------------------
JAVA APPLETS FOR PLAYING AGAINST COMPUTER

http://24.101.164.160/xq/computer/computer.htm 
Xiangqi Database

http://private.addcom.de/dxb/ 
European Xiangqi Federation

http://www.nchess.com/cccmain.htm 
Coffee Chinese Chess

-------------------
LINKS AND RESOURCES

http://weber.ucsd.edu/~dmckiern/xiang_qi.htm

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/index.html (Xiangqi Database - Peter Sung)

http://www.geocities.com/yccheok/index.html

http://www.nchess.com

http://www.yutopian.com/chinesechess/

-------------------
XIANGQI FEDERATIONS

http://wxf.hypermart.net/eg/index.html 
World XiangQi Federation

http://private.addcom.de/dxb/ 
European XiangQi Federation

http://www.asianxiangqi.org/ 
Asian XiangQi Federation

http://tysung.cjb.net/xq/club/txa/txa.htm 
Toronto XiangQi Federation

-----------
DISCUSSIONS

rec.games.chinese-chess 
newsgroup

http://www.nchess.com/forum
Computer XiangQi Forum

http://private.addcom.de/dxb/dxbforum.html 
European XiangQi forum

http://24.102.146.141/xq/mlist.htm 
mailing list from WXF - World Xiangqi Federation - seems inactive

-----------------
ARTICLES AND NEWS

http://www.chez.com/cazaux/champions-xiangqi.htm 
Xiangqi Champions

http://www.chesshub.com/faq/cchess/?L=players 
World's best players

http://private.addcom.de/dxb/dxbhof.html 
Europe's best players

http://www.chesshub.com/faq/cchess/?L=complex 
Space/State in Chess vs Chinese Chess

http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/orient/xiang_lu_world.html 
World Champ vs World game 1

http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/orient/2xiang_lu_world.html 
World Champ vs World game 2

http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/orient/3Lu_world.html 
World Champ vs World game 3

http://www.yutopian.com/chinesechess/history.html 
history of XiangQi

http://www.asianxiangqi.org/English/10axmit/EngAlbum1.htm 
Photographs

http://www.sport.gov.mo/2001/en/xiangqi/index.phtml 
2001 World XiangQi Championships

http://www.cchess.com/others/others.html 
Chinese Chess and Culture

tuyen wrote on Thu, Dec 26, 2002 12:22 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

matt wrote on Sun, Dec 29, 2002 12:51 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
exactly what i needed!!! i'm in china at the moment and i want to start to play chinese chess, this is the first step, i hope its easier than learning the language!!

dsvgsd wrote on Mon, Mar 3, 2003 09:50 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Charles Gilman wrote on Sun, Mar 9, 2003 11:06 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
This is an interesting variant, but it is weakened by the fact that similar pieces on a side start on similar 'colours'. A way of solving this while keeping close to the original would be to increase to ten files to match the ranks, with 4-file-wide palaces. The general could replaced by a standard King and a capturable Wazir, both still confined to the fortress. Both middle files would have Chinese pawns. A further improvement would be allowing the elephants to capture en route.

Travis wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 03:14 AM UTC:Poor ★
Could you please tell the point value of each piece. Such as in Western Chess were the queen is worth 9 points and so on.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 05:42 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Travis: what happens if no one knows them? anyway, Xiangqi is a pretty nice classic game.

Travis wrote on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 02:46 AM UTC:Poor ★
I believe sombody has to know the point values, because Chinese Chess is the oldest form of chess.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 06:16 AM UTC:
Actually, Chanturanga is the oldest form of chess.

Travis wrote on Tue, Apr 1, 2003 02:44 AM UTC:
Can you prove that Chanturanga is the oldest form of chess. What sources can prove that it is the oldest form

John Lawson wrote on Tue, Apr 1, 2003 05:16 AM UTC:
I have checked the books in my library for values.

Terence Donelly, 'Hsiang Ch'i, The Chinese Game of Chess', and Dennis
Leventhal, 'The Chess of China', do not bring up the topic at all.

Sam Sloan, 'Chinese Chess for Beginners', discusses how a table of
values such as is used in FIDE chess is invalid.

H. T. Lau, 'Chinese Chess', gives:
  9    Rook
  4.5  Cannon
  4    Knight
  2    Counsellor
  2    Minister
  2    Pawn (after crossing river)
  1    Pawn (before crossing river)

David Li, 'First Syllabus on Xiangqi', has an eight-page chapter with
six charts, which may be summarized:

  Opening  Midgame  Endgame
   10       10       10      Chariot
    4.5      4.5      4      Cannon
    1        1        1      Cannon, premium when paired
    4        4.5      5      Horse
    1        1        1      Horse, premium when paired
    2.5      2.5      2.5    Advisor
    2.5      2.5      2.5    Elephant
    -        2        2      River-crossed Pawn
    -        -        1.5    Old Pawn (on last rank)
    2        2        2      Center Pawn
     .75      .75      .75   Other Pawns

There it is, for what it's worth.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, May 26, 2003 04:23 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Charles Gilman wrote on Sat, Jun 14, 2003 07:25 AM UTC:
An anonymous contributor makes some implausible claims about the symbols in Xiang Qi in the 'Which came first' debate on the comments on the Chaturanga page (and I see a similar debate is going on here). He describes more pieces as having different symbols on each side than are so shown on this page. Is there any historic truth to what he says about the symbols?

John Lawson wrote on Sat, Jun 14, 2003 02:54 PM UTC:
Good question. Certainly the modern sets that I own only distinguish between the Kings, Elephants, and Pawns. However, book illustrations vary. Most only show the diffences noted, but some also differentiate the Cannons and Advisors. 'The Chess of China', Dennis A. Leventhal, 1978, shows all the pieces with differences between the sides. This book was published in China, and reprinted in Taiwan. What the actual historical usage is, I do not know. I also referred to 'Schachspiele in Ostasien', Peter Banaschak, 2001. I found no reference to it, but my German is weak, and I could well have missed it.

gnohmon wrote on Sun, Jun 15, 2003 03:52 AM UTC:
I have a set in which only Rooks, Knights, and Cannons are the same for the
two sides; however, I believe that I bought this xiang qi set in the late
1960s, and that the date of purchase predates the great simplification in
which Mao's government reduced the number of ideograms in everyday use
from 50,000 to 5000.

Perhaps the great simplification changed the look of Xiang Qi?

Zdeno wrote on Sat, Aug 23, 2003 08:34 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
Hue liako gojuik ask mail [email protected] . Kopta liu ertunduji eh djd Zdeno. Chess ji playing long time. [email protected]

hi wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2003 05:26 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Sep 7, 2003 05:04 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

pitstone wrote on Mon, Sep 8, 2003 04:56 PM UTC:Poor ★
I do not play for a very long time. That is why I rated myself poor.

Chen wrote on Fri, Sep 26, 2003 12:51 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
The Cannons are the most interesting and difficult to use pieces in
Xiangqi, and add much to the tactical potential of the game. The earliest
versions of Xiangqi did not have the Cannons (gunpower was not invented
back then), which made them much less tactically interesting than modern
Xiangqi. Without the Cannons, one's attacking potential is a lot
smaller.
Cannons improved Xiangqi in a similar way to how the increased powers of
the Queen improved Chess. Cannons were added to Chinese Chess during the
Song Dynasty (960 - 1279 AD) when gunpower based weapons were first used.


The Cannon is a great Chinese invention (both on and off the Xiangqi
board!). The Cannon as a chess piece is unique to Chinese Chess and
variants derived from its lineage. (Such as Korean chess) If the primary
European contribution to chess games is the invention of the powerful
Queen, and the Japanese contribution is the invention of rules which
allow
one to use captured pieces as his/her own, then the Cannon, I believe, is
the major Chinese contribution to the chess family of games. This piece
combines the long-range mobility of line pieces and the penetrating power
of leapers. It can strike at the opponent's positions from a distance
like a Rook and penetrate through defensive lines to attack pieces behind
them like a Knight. Rooks have long-range attack ability but can be
obstructed easily with well defended pieces in their line of sight.
Knights can 'see through' the opponent's defenses but can only attack
from close range, where itself is often vulnerable. The Cannon combines
the advantages of both line pieces and leapers in its attack. 

Tactically speaking, the interesting thing about the Cannon is that it is
the only chess piece that can pin TWO pieces at the same time. This also
means discovered attacks involving the Cannons can be more unpredictable.
Two pieces in front of the Cannon have the potential to move off for the
Cannon to strike at the opponent (With other chess pieces, only one piece
would have this potential). When the Cannons double up to form a battery,
their advantage over the Rooks is that they can directly strike two
positions at once, with the Cannon at the rear using its companion in
front as its screen, where the doubled Rooks can only attack one point.

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Fri, Sep 26, 2003 05:17 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
Very interesting comments. I have to admit that I have not easily adapted to cannons, but your observations will make me take a fresh look at them. Thanks, Chen.

vivian yang wrote on Mon, Sep 29, 2003 10:07 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

vivian yang wrote on Sun, Oct 5, 2003 05:38 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

random wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 04:52 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
It's pretty good. Do you have the rules of Chinese Chess that Korean people play with? If you do, that'll be great!

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 03:01 PM UTC:
random: please submit any descriptions of game variations to the editors
using the 'contact form' at the top of the page. 

http://www.chessvariants.com/xiangqi.html

Thanks!

🕸📝Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 04:49 PM UTC:
Tony, I think you misunderstood what random was asking about. He's not
offering a new variant; he is asking if we have the rules for Korean
Chess. We do have them here:

http://www.chessvariants.com/oriental.dir/koreanchess.html

John Ayer wrote on Tue, Dec 2, 2003 04:53 AM UTC:
I have a conjecture about the origin of Chinese Chess. It is known that there was an earlier version, played on a board ten squares by ten, uncheckered; Murray reproduces a reconstructed arrangement by Karl Himly, with the 'king' and 'queen' arranged fore-and-aft in the nine-castle. This is a crucial (in many ways!) error. The current Chinese Chess board, eight squares by nine with a nine-castle at each end and a river across the middle, is known to be older than Chinese Chess, and to have been used for two previous games. There is therefore no basis for drawing the nine-castle on the ten-by-ten-square board for the earlier version. There is also no basis for believing that the earlier board contained a central river. Take them away, and we have the plain ten-by-ten-square board of so many variants, including Shatranj al-Kamil I. It also has the same pieces as Shatranj al-Kamil I: A king, his attendant minister, two elephants moving as alfils, two knights or horses, two rooks, and two orthogonal leapers, with a front rank of pawns. I think therefore that when Chaturanga was introduced into China in the time of the Wei-ti Emperor, and he had the two players beheaded and forbade the use of any game with a piece representing an emperor or called such, Chaturanga was indeed driven out of China. A couple of centuries later Shatranj al-Kamil Type One was introduced along another trade route from Persia. Perhaps the players were informed of the previous edict, or perhaps it was just their native prudence that persuaded them to demote one king to governor and the other to general, each with his appropriate officer. They then moved the game to a native board, abandoning the race game for which that board must have been quite inconvenient. Since the commander-in-chief and his adjutant were now inside a fortress, they were forced to stay within its walls. The elephant, huge, heavy, and one imagines heavily laden, was ruled unable to cross the river. The orthogonal leaper was changed from a camel to a catapult, or cannon, capable of destroying its victim even past a screen, but moving along the ground. The rook, or chariot, was left unchanged, and the pawn and horse were slightly modified for reasons that I don't see. <p>The odd thing is that Murray almost worked this out himself; he remarked on the great similarity between the earlier Chinese game of chess and the Persian variants. I think it was only the spurious nine-castle on Himly's diagram that prevented him from seeing the obvious.

Bjorn wrote on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 06:06 AM UTC:Poor ★
How to Download the game Xiangqi

Charles Gilman wrote on Sun, Dec 14, 2003 10:53 AM UTC:
John Ayer's 'orthogonal leapers' are presumably the piece now called a Dabbaba as that was the extra piece in Shatranj Kamil, to 'complete' a family with the diagonal Elephant and oblique Knight. However the Elephant and Knight of present-day Xiang Qi are steppers - they need to pass through a square adjacent to both start and destination. Would the Dabbaba of the intermediate game have been a stepper rather than a leaper? is ther any evidence of Xiang Qi ever having leaping pieces?

John Ayer wrote on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 12:21 AM UTC:
Yes, I was speaking of the dabbaba(h). As for whether Chinese Chess ever had a leaper, I doubt anyone knows. Murray quotes a later Chinese work on chess, I suspect from the Ming dynasty, remarking on how little they knew of how chess was played in the Tang and Sung periods, except that it was obviously different.

benjamin wrote on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 02:20 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
You discribe the stuff very good.

69 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.