[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Game Reviews by Joshua Morris
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
I have played this game many times; it remains one of my favorite Chess variants.
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
I love it. Draws are far too common in OrthoChess. A hard-fought battle to the draw can be satisfying, but most - stalemates, draws where one side has two knights while the other is left with a bare king - are unsatisfying.
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
I've played this game a few times now. It's fun! Does white have an advantage? White won most of the games we played.
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
![A game information page](/index/link.gif)
I find SRC amusing. The site contains pages of Chess history, fiction, and poetry - what's wrong with Chess humor? I don't think humor ought to be excluded just because some Chess players are humorless. :)
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
Damn! I recently had a very similar idea for a 5x5 set of 5x5 boards. Thought I was the first. I guess my game will have to be a Hyperchess variant. :)
![A game information page](/index/ms.gif)
Imaginative! I (and many others, I'm sure) have often thought of playing Bughouse using Grand Chess or Capablanca Chess or something in place of OrthoChess, but I've never considered playing Bughouse with two different games. It's a fascinating idea. Personally, I think it would be even more interesting to allow captured pieces to retain their character on the new board rather than morphing to fit the game being played. I'd love to see Orthodox Chess played side-by-side with Shogi; imagine the horror on a Shogi player's face when his opponent drops a queen on the board.
![A game information page](/index/ms.gif)
Damn. I've been working on a ShortRange variant with pieces very similar to your Elephant, Tiger, and Duke - identical, in fact, save for one less square of range (WB3, FR3, and Q2). Great minds... *smirk* I'll still throw it out there if playtesting proves it to be any good - it's just that now I'll look like a copycat. 'It's not a ripoff...it's an homage!' :) As for Cataclysm, I like it. I like the big board. I like all the pieces save the Great Rook, and that's only because I have a personal dislike of hoppers. All in all, it looks like fun.
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
I'm surprised there have been no comments on this game, particularly given the popularity of Grand Chess. The game is great as presented, but it also makes an excellent game for Bughouse - the absence of queens and the destruction of pawns makes it even better than Orthodox Bughouse, in my opinion.
![A game information page](/index/ms.gif)
Interesting idea. I've often wondered what a triangular Chess might look like. Also: Oww, my brain!
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
Just wanted to add my 'Excellent' rating. This game is right up there with Grand Chess. I have a question for all you Wildebeesters. Either side can deliver a smothered Fool's Mate on move 2 using the long leap of a Camel or Wildebeest. This can be defended against in a few ways. Does this cause opening variety to be limited, in anyone's experience? Or is it more like Qh5 in OrthoChess, an aggressive move that tends to backfire if the opponent defends well?
![A game information page](/index/game.gif)
This is too funny. Sounds like a recipe for entertaining chaos. :)
11 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.