Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sat, Feb 10 07:18 AM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from 03:04 AM:

Since when did 1.5 and 1 ply become an option?

Already a long time ago, when it turned out that some large games (Tenjiku Shogi?) took unacceptably long time at 2 ply.

It also had to do with an improvement in the AI. Originally I did not want depths so low that the AI would not be able to see checkmate in 1. And it only sees checkmate if it searches deep enough to see the capture of the King. More specifically, in a leaf node, when it generates moves to see if there still is any move it should search (but none other qualify), it would notice capture of a King (but then not search that, but just declare victory). That means it needed 2 ply to see if it can deliver such a mate, and 3 ply to see that the opponent could deliver it. But this is ameliorated by the fact that logical continuations of the previous two ply (i.e. moves that were not possible 2 ply earlier, also when this was in the game history) get an extension. So if you move a piece to a position where it can deliver checkmate on the next move, it would recognize the threat.

But at some point I made the AI aware of check in leave nodes that were delivered by the moved piece, by generating the moves of only that piece for the side that is not on move. And if this could capture the King, extend the search one ply to see if evasion was possible. This took off one ply of the depth needed to recognize checkmate. At least, if it wasn't delivered by a discovered check. I considered that justifiable, as humans can often also be tricked by discovered checks. So it makes the weakness of the AI more human-like.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Ghost King Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.