Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Dec 14, 2003 06:45 PM UTC:
Tony P.,

I already responded briefly to this quotation of yours, but now I will
respond in more detail:

'but that they did not have the same FULL MEANING as on the chessboard
(crossing edges at right angles, but also moving along paths
that are at right angles), which in turn did parallel the more
comprehensive meanings used in mathematics (as opposed to the less
specific 'at right angles' dictionary entry).'

There are certain problems with using orthogonal to describe lines of
movement that are orthogonal to each other. First, it does not describe a
quality that belongs to any line of movement. Rather, it describes a
quality of the relation between two different lines of movement. Second,
it does not distinguish how a Rook moves from how a Bishop moves. On a
standard chessboard, the Bishop's lines of movement are also orthogonal
to each other, for they too are at right angles to each other.

But if we take an orthogonal line of movement to be a line of movement
that intersects the boundaries of a space at right angles, it describes a
quality of the movement itself, and it distinguishes how a Rook moves from
how a Bishop moves. It also fits well with the very first definition given
in Webster's: 'intersecting or lying at right angles.' It is movement
along a line that intersects the boundaries of spaces at right angles.

Now, if we combine these two senses of orthogonal and call it the FULL
MEANING of orthogonal, as you seem to suggest we should do, we have really
just conflated two independent ideas.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Constitutional Characters

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.