Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2018 11:08 AM UTC:

When I got up this morning, I wanted to play solitaire (specifically a game called Gaps) on my Kindle Fire, and this got me thinking about how computers have already taken over the playing of solitaire. I used to play solitaire card games with actual cards, but this requires making space available for the cards and manually placing them. It's so much easier to let my tablet or computer quickly arrange the cards, and it's more convenient to deal with cards on a computer screen than laid out on some surface. I'm also under the impression that many other people have taken to playing solitaire on computers instead of with actual cards.

A couple factors could explain why computerized solitaire games seem to have overtaken the physical game in popularity, whereas computerized Chess still lags in popularity behind Chess on a physical board. One is that cards are essentially two-dimensional in function, whereas Chess pieces tend to be be three-dimensional. So, less is lost of the physical experience of playing solitaire with cards when you play it on a computer screen instead of with actual cards. The other is that solitaire is something you play by yourself, but Chess is something you play with another person. When two people are playing a board game together, it is more convenient to use physical equipment. When playing Chess or a Chess variant, each player can see the board from his own perspective even while his opponent is thinking about his next move. Using a physical set also allows for more interaction between the players, and part of the reason for playing Chess or Chess variants may be social in nature.

I have previously read about coffee tables having computer screens, and I think that would be a great way for people to play Chess variants together. Hologram technology like seen in Star Wars would also help a lot. This would provide some of the same advantages a physical board still has over playing on a computer screen. If people could start playing 3D versions of the old MS-DOS computer game Battle Chess, in which pieces engage in holographic combat scenes, that could go a long way toward making computerized Chess a common way for two people to play the game together. That could then set the stage for people more frequently playing Chess variants together. After all, the technology for playing holographic Chess could also be used to play other Chess variants holographically. Not being limited to one set, people may be more interested in exploring Chess variants that use different equipment.

Regarding the Kindle DX, I bought mine on ebay a few months ago, because I really wanted it. I previously bought a regular Kindle DX, but a button broke, and fixing it with crazy glue made it worse. So I set my sights on a Kindle DX Graphite and eventually won an auction after losing several others. Actually, I returned one because it wouldn't charge, and then I bought another. The battery will drain quickly if I turn on wireless, but it works fine as long as I download books to my computer and copy them to the DX via USB. Since it's not my main Kindle, this is not much of an issue. When I had the one that wouldn't charge, I did look into videos on how to replace the battery, and I at least know they are out there. So, you could look into that and maybe refurbish your DX with a new battery.


Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.