Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Joe Joyce wrote on Sun, Oct 4, 2009 04:31 PM EDT:
Hey, Sam. The FIDE attack density is 4.0, check your numbers. ;-)

This balances the attack density of FIDE with Capa. So what accounts for
the extra strength of Capa, compared to FIDE? There are a number of factors
that might enter into this. Compression, for example, the ratio of width to
depth. For FIDE, 8/8 = 1.0, for Capa, 10/8 = 1.25. The opposing pieces are
relatively squeezed together. And that's why Grand Chess, 10/10 = 1, feels
so open compared to Capa. At least it does for me. Even though the extra
squares are 'behind' the starting arrays. Elongation is a good name for
this, and it has its own effects. Gary Gifford used them in his ShortRange
Project games. The Capa - Grand Chess pair is a very good example of
elongation.

But that's just one part of the [very complex, non-linear] equation. With
FIDE, Capa [and Grand, all] having the same attack density, why is Capa
'stronger' than FIDE? Consider the long range pieces. FIDE has 5/8th of
its pieces long range, 62.5%; Capa has 7/10th, 70%. With the individual
rook or bishop types, FIDE is 3/8, 37.5%, to Capa's 4/10, 40%. This
doesn't quite seem to be enough to explain all the difference between the
2 games. ;-)

Okay, here I'll admit that FIDE has one grade A power piece, of 8, 12.5%.
Capa has 3 of 10, 30%. This does explain why the games feel different, but
it doesn't give a lot of insight into the exact how. Just how are they
different? Can we put numbers to this, that have predictive value for other
games, with less-familiar pieces? So we should keep looking around.

The mean free path is another concept that keeps popping up as relevant.
How far can a piece move before it bumps into another piece? This area has
a lot of wrinkles to it. Enough so they might wait for the next post.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.