Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Derek Nalls wrote on Sun, May 11, 2008 10:05 PM UTC:
Before Scharnagl sent me three special versions of SMIRF MS-174c compiled
with the CRC material values of Scharnagl, Muller & Nalls, I began
playtesting something else that interested me using SMIRF MS-174b-O.

I am concerned that the material value of the rook (especially compared to
the queen) amongst CRC pieces in the Muller model is too low:

rook  55.88
queen  111.76

This means that 2 rooks exactly equal 1 queen in material value.

According to the Scharnagl model:

rook  55.71
queen  91.20

This means that 2 rooks have a material value (111.42) 22.17% greater than
1 queen.

According to the Nalls model:

rook  59.43
queen  103.05

This means that 2 rooks have a material value (118.86) 15.34% greater than
1 queen.

Essentially the Scharnagl & Nalls models are in agreement in predicting
victories in a CRC game for the player missing 1 queen yet possessing 2
rooks.  By contrast, the Muller model predicts draws (or appr. equal
number of victories and defeats) in a CRC game for either player.

I put this extraordinary claim to the test by playing 2 games at 10
minutes per move on an appropriately altered Embassy Chess setup with the
missing-1-queen player and the missing-2-rooks player each having a turn
at white and black.

The missing-2-rooks player lost both games and was always behind.  They
were not even long games at 40-60 moves.

Muller:

I think you need to moderately raise the material value of your rook in
CRC.  It is out of its proper relation with the other material values
within the set.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.