"that is allows us to spotlight a game for its quality and not just for its popularity or historic value."
OK but who is "us", what is the process to judge the quality? I fear the boundaries are more than vague here.
It is maybe a semantic question. What do you mean by "featured" exactly? Is that "having distinctive aspects", "having something special" which is rather neutral, or is that bearing some positive appreciation, meaning that this game is better than others?
There are also 2 other lists which translate the popularity of the different CVs. One based on the number of games played on Game Courier:
Both lists have to be taken with caution as there are by no means fully objective, anyway it gives some ideas. And maybe there are better and less arbitrary recognitions.
"that is allows us to spotlight a game for its quality and not just for its popularity or historic value."
OK but who is "us", what is the process to judge the quality? I fear the boundaries are more than vague here.
It is maybe a semantic question. What do you mean by "featured" exactly? Is that "having distinctive aspects", "having something special" which is rather neutral, or is that bearing some positive appreciation, meaning that this game is better than others?
There are also 2 other lists which translate the popularity of the different CVs. One based on the number of games played on Game Courier:
https://www.chessvariants.com/play/pbm/listgames.php
One based on the numbers of "like" received by a game:
https://www.chessvariants.com/index/favorites.php
Both lists have to be taken with caution as there are by no means fully objective, anyway it gives some ideas. And maybe there are better and less arbitrary recognitions.