George Duke wrote on Thu, Apr 13, 2017 08:26 PM UTC:
In Bob versus Bo 1972, you know Fischer-Spassky Game 6, Spassky stood and joined the audience upon completion in applause it was supposedly so great a game. Yet instead if 15 ...Rxc5, there are 1 0-0 Ra7 or 1 Rxc5 Qxc5 or 1 b4 Rxc1. First impression proposals, correct them if they're wrong. Annotations never seem to have mentioned the obvious. Where is the fallacy that Black now stands better after Rxc5? I would look at programs for Bifurcators or Rococo or Eurasian or Three Player or Time Travel or Falcon Chess, when they exist, but not for peewee famous Game 6 a la Fischer/Kasparov/Carlsen. White's position is not so good and Black has to capitalize immediately.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044366. Throw out the frivolous ones K. versus world, C. versus world, Astronaut versus whomever, and the above is about the best game ever played, but it should never have reached the great finale.
In Bob versus Bo 1972, you know Fischer-Spassky Game 6, Spassky stood and joined the audience upon completion in applause it was supposedly so great a game. Yet instead if 15 ...Rxc5, there are 1 0-0 Ra7 or 1 Rxc5 Qxc5 or 1 b4 Rxc1. First impression proposals, correct them if they're wrong. Annotations never seem to have mentioned the obvious. Where is the fallacy that Black now stands better after Rxc5? I would look at programs for Bifurcators or Rococo or Eurasian or Three Player or Time Travel or Falcon Chess, when they exist, but not for peewee famous Game 6 a la Fischer/Kasparov/Carlsen. White's position is not so good and Black has to capitalize immediately.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044366. Throw out the frivolous ones K. versus world, C. versus world, Astronaut versus whomever, and the above is about the best game ever played, but it should never have reached the great finale.