Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Greg Strong wrote on Sat, Jul 15, 2017 04:52 AM UTC:

All observations are welcome and I certainly don't think that there is any taboo against new 'twists' in general.  I hope it doesn't appear that way.

What I see is that a lot of new inventors get carried away adding rules.  It's possible that every single rule is good, but I've played a very large number of variants over the last 15 years, so I have some basis for my doubts.  Especially since often the new inventors have no history of playing chess variants here, and so I assume they have no real history of exploring the world of chess variants in general (although in some cases that may be incorrect, but probably not.)  It's good to explore first so you have a better idea of what makes a good game, and then start simple.  You can always add rules later when you find room for improvement.

That said, inventors who want to go hog-wild are welcome to do so, but understand that it greatly increases the changes that your game won't see much play.  There are thousands of games on this site and most are not played with any regularity at all.  Many will probably never, ever be played again.  It takes care, research, dedication, and flexibility to make a variant that plays well enough, and is appealing enough, that players will want to play it.

Regarding the specific rules in question in this game, forbidding a player from resigning a game doesn't make any sense to me.  A hypothetical situation goes like this... White: "I resign."   Black: "No, sorry, you are not in check so you can't resign."  White: (stands up and walks away.)  Now what?  If you are playing on a clock a player can always just stop moving until his time runs out.  That's identical to a resignation but you've just forced the winning player to sit around and wait for the clock to run out.  (The would-be resigner isn't forced to wait around as he can just walk and not waste his time - unless, of course, you add another rule that players must be chained to the table until the game is over.)  And with a game with no clocks - no time control - the situation is even worse.  The player who does not want to play just stops moving.  At least with a resignation, the game ends.  Now the game officially never ends.  Walking away can't be considered a resignation, since that is illegal, so effectively, any time you are losign a game and are not in check, you can walk away and the game never ends and you never lose.

Regarding Kevin's comment on why this might make sense I can't address as I don't really understand what he is saying.  But remember, in any formal tournament, the they can stipulate custom scoring systems or other guidelines for that tournament.

The rules around passing may be good or bad.  I don't know.  Like H. G. I'm wondering what the use case is for this rule.  With unusual additional rules like this, if there is a reason, it should be spelled out - since naturally people will wonder.  If it was just something that was made up on a whim, it should be acknowledged that it's an untested idea and raised as a discussion point.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Chess and a Half

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.