Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Nick Wolff wrote on Tue, Apr 4, 2017 08:47 PM EDT:

155 comments and most of them extensive.  I do apologize if I'm asking material that has already been covered, but there's not a lot of time in my day as of late.  I've recently started looking at (haven't played) variants with different armies - this is notably one of the most popular variants on this site.  

I'm in no regards an expert (or anywhere close) to determining piece/army values and I have several questions surrounding it.  

- How even are the armies used in this variant?
- How are piece/army values determined and are they static based on board position, what pieces are currently in play, the army of the opponent, etc?
- How does one test and determine equality of different armies?
- If I ever became ambitious and maybe decided to come up with my own army (loosely translated to "if I ever have to time"), what are the processes to do this.  

I've seen this variant around for many years, I've come across recently Spartan Chess, I'm familiar with the Maharaja Chess where it's one piece vs an army (which I think is always a win for white if played right).  Does anyone have experience with this and have tips?  What if I wanted to do something on a 10x10 board?

I'm sorry if this has already been covered.  Thanks!

Nick


Edit Form

Comment on the page Chess with Different Armies

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.