Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Tue, Feb 9, 2010 05:34 PM UTC:
It is easy to prove this game is lost for the Maharadja. Replacing it by a Queen will only makes matters worse.

The proof consists of a sequenc of black moves that go through positions wth constellations of black pieces that satisfy the following conditions:
1) A Maharadja can only check the black King from squares that are attacked by black, wherever it would be on the board.
2) All black pieces other than King are at protected by at least one other pieces, or:
2b) if there are any unprotected black pieces, a Maharadja can only attack them from squares attacked by black.
3) Pawn moves are done only to squares that were attacked by black  before the Pawn moves.

Condition 2b is needed to make the initial position satisfy the conditions: The Rooks on a8 and h8 are undefended, but because of the Pawn shield the Maharadja cannot attack them through Rook or Bishop moves, while the squares at a Knight's jump distant (b6, c7, f7, g6) are all defended (by K, Q, Pa7 and Ph7).

Using such a sequece of moves, you can finally create a black constelation where every empty square of the board is attacked, meaning the Maharadja must be checkmated at that point, if not before. There is just nothing it can do against it. Condition 3 makes sure that the Maharadja never can block any Pawn moves. Black just follows his own plan;

Edit Form

Comment on the page Maharaja and the Sepoys

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.