The Chess Variant Pages

Towards the theory of Byzantine Chess

The rules of Byzantine Chess are known but its theory did not survive.
An attempt of its reconstruction is given on this page.
The material is selected in the following topics: 

1.The orthodox chess pieces on the square and circular board

2.The shatranj pieces on various boards

3.Comparison between the Byzantine Chess and Circular Chess

The Byzantine Chess endgames will be discussed on a separate page. 



For other information see the LINKS to Byzantine Chess.



The pieces on circular board

Notation on the circular board

Byzantine Chess is a variant of Shatranj  played on the round board  (with perimeter of 16 and width of 4 squares). 

This board can be obtained from the standard 8x8 board separated into two halves:
the first including the Q-side (files a-b-c-d)  and the second including the K-side (files e-f-g-h).
Then, this two strips are glued so that their 1st and 8th ranks are connected.
(namely, a1-b1-c1-d1 with e1-f1-g1-h1 and a8-b8-c8-d8 with e8-f8-g8-h8).
Thus, the closed circular board  is obtained.
It is convenient to imagine it in the rectangular diagram 



as in the Java  and Zillions-of-Games  computer programs playing Byzantine Chess.
One should merely bear in mind that the left and right edges are glued,
e.g. a King from d4 may go on d5 and c5. 

We do not know how the Constantinople chessplayers denoted the squares,
but the above notation used in Circular Chess  (the modern version of Byzantine Chess) looks natural and convenient.


The centre and the edges

The files a and h are combined into the single string which now has the form of closed ring.

Starting from the arbitrary point on ring a-h and going along it, a King will return to the initial position having passed the closed circle of 16 squares.
The rest three files (rings) are d-e, b-g  and c-f

The rings b-g  and c-f  constitute the center of the board,
while its edges are formed by the rings a-h  and d-e.
Thus, there are only two different types of squares:
the full space is divided in equals halves between
the 32 central squares and 32 bordering squares. 


The opening setup

In the frames of the accepted notation the pieces in the opening stand at the same positions as denoted for them in the orthodox chess.

For example, white Rooks stand on a1 and h1 etc.
Therefore, the initial setup in rectangular development looks as


On the relevant circular development  the kings stand on the inner perimeter
and the CW rotation on the circular board corresponds to the motion from right to left on the rectangular development. 

The opposite direction (left to right) corresponds to the CCW rotation. 

Therefore the CW or left Pawns are: 

a2, b2, c2, d2 (White)


    e7, f7, g7, h7 (Black).


  The CCW or right Pawns are:

e2, f2, g2, h2 (White)


a7, b7, c7, d7 (Black).


The Pawns

Each partner has two separate arrays of pawns (four pawns at the K-side and four pawns at the Q-side). 

The pawns have different significance depending on their position.
There are only two principle positions for Pawns: in the centre (more valuable) and at the edge.
In the initial setup either player has four pawns of both kinds.

Pawns at the edge

The Rook's Pawns at K-side and Q-side are very similar to each other because either has two defenders  (a Rooks and a Knight). 

But the Queen's Pawn,  supported only by the King's Knight, is weaker than the King's Pawn, protected twice.

Central Pawns

The Bishop's Pawns are also twice protected (c-Pawn is supported by Queen, f-Pawn is supported by King and both - by Knights). 

The weak Knight's Pawns are not protected at all.
But the place of the Knight's Pawn at the K-side (g2 and g7)  must be considered as the weakest point, because the enemy's Knight, appeared on it, checkmates the King as it happens in the scholar's mate.


The motivation of playing on the circular board

Whereas the pieces obey the shatranj rules (with few exceptions concerning the pawns), the geometry of circular board adds new properties.


  • The Kingside and Queenside are separated.
  • The Pawns may go either clockwise or counterclockwise.
  • The strength of Rooks is increased.

These reasons are enough to explain the choice of the circular board.

However, the most striking difference from Shatranj is not so evident because it concerns the transformation of the Bishops' trajectories on the round board.
In fact, the Bishops of Byzantine Chess are endowed with quite new possibilities.

According to the shatranj rules, a Bishop jumps diagonally over one square so that his move is a slip in two diagonals.
On the square board the Bishops of the opponents never collide. 




depicts the full set of squares available for the dark-coloured Bishops.
The dark-coloured Bishop of White has the initial stay at c1 and cannot reach f8 where the dark-coloured Bishop of Black sits in the opening.
The paths of Bc1 and Bc8 have no point of intersection.

The light-coloured Bishops 


also never meet. 

Therefore, all four Bishops keep neutrality. 

The circular board of the Byzantine Chess provides interaction of the Bishops and
peaceful co-existence is now impossible

Each Bishop goes along the strictly determined trace.
Among the eight squares available to him: four are on the central c-f file and four are on the bordering a-h file.
The dark-coloured Bishop can stay on c1, c5, f8, f4 and a3, a7, h6, h2

  while the light-coloured Bishop can stay on   f1, f5, c8, c4 and h3, h7, a6, a2


The Bishops of identical colour go the same path and can capture each other.

The rule of moves have not been changed but the Bishops reveal sufficiently new behavior.
How could it happen? 

On the square board a Bishop from the K-side is transferred to the Q-side passing the "equator" between  the files d and e.
On the circular board the direct communication between the K-side and Q-side
does not occur.
Hence, if a piece goes from the K-side to the Q-side, his short route, drawn on the square board, transforms in a long march on the round board (and conversely).

The "interests" of Bishops from the opposite armies clash on the squares of common colour and this fact forms the background for new tactical motives in Byzantine Chess.

Thus, playing on the circular board is not a peculiar fantasy of Byzantine scholars.


Strategy: the Kingside or Queenside?

It is seen from the initial setup that the circular board is divided into two distinct parts, because

the K-side (files e-f-g-h) and the Q-side (files a-b-c-d) are disconnected and can be called more properly as fronts rather than wings.
Contrary to the chess on 8x8 board, the Queen's and King's sides live their individual life
and advance at one side cannot be counterbalanced at the other side.
As a rule the main events take place at the K-side.

    The attack at the Q-side is not so prospective as on the square board. 

  • The Q-side game was reasonable in view of making a breakthrough and the passed Pawns.
  • This policy was possible due to the pressure of figures.
  • The Q-side development usually involves activity in the centre.

   On the round board these factors are absent. 

  • The Pawns have promotion and cannot become a serious threat.
  • The weak Bishop and, especially, Queen can contribute very small to destruction of the opponent's defense.
  • The circular board has no centre in the sense of four squares d4-e4-e5-d5 and there is no possibility to contribute simultaneously from the K-side because it is separated from the Q-side.

Thus, the early development of the Q-side is dubious, because the opponent can rapidly mobilize his forces at the K-side for a sharp and decisive attack.

The strong Queen and Bishop of Circular Chess  provides theoretical possibility for the Q-side attack,  although the main events take place at the K-side very often, particularly in the central game of the recent Circular Chess championship


The quick mates

In Byzantine Chess the quickest "scholar's" checkmate is accomplished by a Knight in four moves.  

White do it so:
    1. Ng1-h3  a7-a6
    2. Nh3-f4  a6-a5
    3. Nf4- h5  Ra8-a6
    4. Nh5 x g7#



  Another variant:
    1. Ng1-f3  -- 2. Nh4 --   3. Nf5  --   4. Nf5 x g7#
with the same finale. 

In the similar manner and also at the fourth move such checkmate can be declared by Black.
    1. -- Ng8-h6  2. -- Nh6-f5  3. -- Nf5-h4  4. -- Nh4 x g2#
    1. -- Ng8-f6  2. -- Nf6-h5  3. -- Nh5-f4  4. -- Nf4 x g2#

There are many ways to checkmate by a Knight in 5 and 6 moves. 

A Bishop can also declare a smothered checkmate, however, not sooner than at the 7th move.
For example:
    1. Bf1 - h3  Bc8 - a6
    2. g2 - g3   Ke8 - c8
    3. f2 - f3  Nb8 - e8
    4. f3 - f4   Ra8 - b8
    5.  e2 - e3   Ng8 - h6
    6. Bh3 - f5   Rh8 - g8
    7. Bf5 x h7 # 



A mate by Pawn also requires, at least, 7 moves:
    1. e2-e3 --  2. e4 --  3. e5 --   4. Ng1-f3 --   5. Nf3-g5 --   6. e6 --   7. e6 x f7# 



A Rook checkmates not sooner than at the 8th move.
For example
    1. h2 - h3   Ng8-f6
    2. h3 - h4   B f8 - h6
    3. h4 - h5   b7 - b6
    4. Rh1 - h4   Bh6 - f8
    5. Ra1 - h3   Bf8 - a7
    6. Rh4 - e4.  Ba7 - f8
    7. Rh3 - e3.  a7-a6
    8. Re4 x e7# 



A Queen (who goes only one diagonal) is able to prepare a checkmate at the 11th move:
    1 move by a Pawn (e or g) plus
    1 move by the Bishop f1 (in order to open the way out for the Queen),
    8 moves for the Queen to reach f7;
    2 moves for the Knight g1 to land on  e5 or h6 (in order to support the Queen): 



Symmetric version of Byzantine chess

In this alternative version of Byzantine chess

the initial positions of the black King and Queen are replaced so that
the black King is situated on the dark square while the black Queen stands on the light square: 



Such replacement results in the appearance of interaction between the Queens.
A Queen steps one square diagonally and may go on the squares of one colour as
a Bishop of modern chess.
In the ordinary Byzantine Chess the Queens never intersect, because the white Queen goes on the light squares, while the black Queen goes on the dark squares.
In the symmetric Byzantine Chess both Queens may walk on the same squares
(light on the above diagram).

But the main difference from the ordinary Byzantine Chess concerns the strategy rather than tactics. 

Now the Kingsides and Queensides are situated symmetrically (as in modern chess after castling on the opposite sides). .
As a result the game develops at both fronts.
From his Q-side White attacks the K-side of the opponent,
while Black has better chances at his Q-side situated in front of the K-side of White.


The relative values of pieces

In order to determine the game principles it is important to specify the prices of pieces.

Since the pieces of Byzantine Chess obey the shatranj rules
the strongest figure is Rook, the middle is Knight, and the two weakest are Queen and Bishop (they have approximately equivalent power).
    So, there are three classes of figures and the Pawns.

The properties of shatranj  pieces are modified on the circular board (for example, right defense in the endgame K+R vs K allows to avoid a mate).
The most natural way to get precise theoretical estimations is practice, particularly
the Zillions-of-Games or Java  computer programs may allow to acquire some game experience. 

    Thus, for the first step we have a plain arithmetical definition of the piece’s strength as an average number of squares being under its control.

Knight and Rook

A Knight controls:

9 squares when it stands in the centre of the 8x8 board (it goes on 8 squares plus the square on which it stands),
and only 3 when it stands in the corner. 

There are no corners on the circular board, while the number of central squares and the squares at the edges is the same (32).
A Knight on the circular board controls:
    7 squares when it stands in the centre:


and 5 when it stands at the edge: 

  Hence, the average value of Knight on the circular board is  (7 x 32 + 5 x 32) / 64 = 6.


All 64 squares are available for Rook and it controls 19 squares without regard of its situation: 

  the whole ring of 16 squares (including the square on which the Rooks stands) and 3 squares in the transversal direction.
(Rook on the 8x8 board controls 15 squares simultaneously).

Queen and Bishop

Queen and Bishop form  the class of weak figures whose significance twice smaller than 1 Knight and corresponds to 1.5-2 Pawns. 

A Queen can stand on each of 32 squares corresponding to its color.
Being in centre, it controls 5 squares, 

and only 3 -- when it stands at the edges 

 Therefore, the average is (5 x 16 + 3 x 16) / 32 = 4.
In fact, a Queen of orthodox chess is much stronger: on the circular board it holds 27 squares simultaneously.


The Byzantine Chess Bishop controls 3 squares without regard of its situation.

A Bishop of orthodox chess includes the functions of shatranj Queen and Bishop. On the circular board he always controls 7 squares. 


A Pawn holds 2 squares: the first on which it stands and the second on which it can land.
This evaluation corresponds to the free board where the capture is not included.
However, it does not increases the Pawn strength in the real game because
the opponent's Pawns or figures can often block the motion.
The estimation of 2 implies that a Pawn is three times weaker than a Knight (6).

The evaluation  (9 x 32 + 6 x 32) / 64 = 7.5  derived for a King is not so informative,
because this piece stands aside from other pieces for he cannot be captured or exchanged.

The averaging over square board is slightly more complicated and the similar calculation can be done for arbitrary board and set of pieces. 

It is convenient to express the strength of pieces in the pawn equivalent (1 unit for a Pawn). 


The orthodox chess pieces on the square and circular board

The relative strength of orthodox chess pieces is selected in the table below: 




Square board

Circular board
















The strength of long-range figures (Queen, Rook, Bishop) corresponds to the free board and is always overestimated, because in real games they often act in the closed positions.
Nevertheless, it is clear that such figures become much stronger on the circular board, while the other pieces remain at approximately their ordinary level. 

It is strange that on the round board a Knight has become even weaker.
The corners of the square board are compensated by the absence of "deep" centre inside the round board: indeed, this circular strip it is very narrow (only 4 cells), or better to say, "shallow", for a Knight.
Only on the torus shaped board without edges the Knight achieves his maximal strength.

In order to get the realistic values for the long-range figures, approximately two units must be extracted from the above numbers.

Queen = 10
Rook = 5.5
Bishop = 3

  on the square board, while 

Queen = 11.5
Rook = 7.5

on the circular board. 

A Bishop on the narrow circular board does not belong to this class, because its trace does not exceed 4 squares.
Therefore the estimation of Bishop must be reduced very little so that its price will not be much higher than that of a Knight. 


The shatranj pieces on various boards

The estimation of the shatranj pieces looks so: 





Byzantine Chess

Toroidal Byzantine Chess


5.5 (7.5)

7.5 (9.5)

7.5 (9.5)

















The values without correction (for the long-range moves) are given in brackets.

A Rook has become stronger than a pair of Knights,
and the standard formula  Rook + Pawn  = 2Knights  requires revision.


Comparison between the Byzantine Chess and Circular Chess

The summary strength of the Circular Chess pieces is 53.25 (with correction).

The relevant value for the Byzantine Chess is only 37.75

These numeric estimations reflect the tactical contents of both chess variants.
The weak Queens and Bishops of Byzantine Chess result to the evident difference from the Circular Chess:
the complex combinations in Byzantine Chess appear rare and strategy often prevails over tactics.

As a result, the most common and trivial method to win is the utter capture of the opponent's forces
(bare king is recognized as loss), while checkmate (and stalemate, declared also as win) takes place relatively rare. 



The knowledge of the pieces'  values is necessary for making correct exchanges.


On the square board 2 Knights are nominally better than 1 Rook.
On the circular board the exchange of  2N  for 1R  is quite well.
In fact, the Rook on the circular board  is almost 1.5 times stronger than it was on the square board.
As a result, the formula

R = 2N + B


    2N + Q > R > 2N+1P

suits to this exchange. 


The table of the pieces values allows to write the other expressions 

   N = 2B = Q + P 

    Q > B > P


The exchanges 

    Q = 2P

    B < 2P

    Q < B + P

are less evident, because they strongly depend on the particular game background and the form of the Pawns array.








Written by Anatoly Khalfine and Ernst Saperow

To contact the authors, please email:  (email removed contact us for address) 

WWW page created: August 19, 2002.