The Chess Variant Pages
Custom Search

Apothecary Chess 2


This article is one of two twin articles about Apothecary chess. Apothecary chess aims to be the first couple out of a series of apothecary games. I've started the design of the two apothecary games with great thoughts in mind. First it was that in my opinion chess has become stale at grand master level. Second I like more games that enlarge the board and add a few pieces. Third I am thinking which can be the next incarnation of chess at the mentioned level. There are two variants from what I know which to some degree claim to try to be the next incarnation of chess, these being Grand Chess and Omega Chess(with it's variation omega chess advanced). I personally like them both. To me also come in mind Shako and Eurasian Chess. Renaissance Chess is out there for even bigger boards as I was introduced to Gross Chess during the design of my two games. Chess with different armies comes to mind, too, as an alternative but that's on a different path. Personally with these two games I'm attempting to take the best of both worlds from Grand Chess and Omega Chess. Also I've added a few of my own ideas, The way I have added my ideas give the name apothecary, as I mostly tinkered with things I had at hand, as old pharmacists used to do. An example is  the way pawn promotion works in this game.

During the development phase I kept in touch with the community trying to get feedback receiving help in several ways.

This particular game is called apothecary chess 2 and it is based mostly on grand chess with elements taken from Omega Chess. In order to keep piece density equal to that of regular chess I've decided to add several minor pieces. They were initially placed on the back rank. But the camel and zebra proved to be a bit to dangerous in the opening. Also the rooks were unconnected now. In order to cope with that I decided to introduce hanging squares akin to Greg Strong's Brouhaha game. Now the camel,zebra and elephants start there. Also I took the idea from advanced omega chess of enhancing the slow knight but I did not want to use the same piece as in Apothecary chess 1 so I gave it a threeper move (a treaper may jump diagonally to the four squares at a distance of three) as the threeleaper (a treeleaper may jump orthogonal to the four squares at a distance of three) power goes to the elephant (which in this game is a modern elephant- a piece that can step 1 diagonally or jump two squares also diagonally) also for speed reasons but also for unbounding reasons. The game also has a camel that  in this game has an wazir (an wazir moves 1 square orthogonal) just move for unbounding and a zebra that has also a ferz (a ferz steps one square diagonally) move for symmetry (otherwise an already weak piece would have been  even weaker than the other minor pieces).

Apothecary chess 2 is a game on a larger than orthodox board that keeps the orthodox piece density providing a longer (hopefully not tedious) game with many tactics and a rich strategy.


The board is 10x10 with 8 brouhaha squares (more on them later) so 10x10+8. The ranks are numbered (0),1,2,3,...9,10,(11) and the files are denoted with a,b,c,...i,j. The parentheses stand for ranks that have only brouhaha squares.

There are 24 possible initial setups for this game. For the purpose of explaining the initial setup pieces are split in seven categories:

1. The king has a fixed start location f2 for white f9 for black.

2. Rook pieces are the two rooks of each player which also have fixed start locations, a1 and j1 for white and a10 and j10 for black

3. The major pieces (three of them Queen, Chancellor,Archbishop; are the three strongest pieces in the game). They are placed on the board according to two variables. The first is a binary variable (may be represented by a coin toss) which can take the values winged (false,0,tails) or grand classic(true,1,heads). If the variable is winged then the three major pieces occupy the b2,e2,i2 squares for white and b9,e9,i9 for black. If the variable is grand classic (a reference on how the pieces are arranged in Cristian Freeling's Grand Chess) then the three major pieces occupy the d2,e2,g2 squares for white and d9,e9,g9 squares for black. Either way there are three spots and three major pieces to fill those spots. For that we have the second variable with six possible values (3 factorial). A dice throw may decide where pieces go like below:

   1. from left to right Archbishop,Chancellor,Queen (nicknamed ladder-because pieces are on a ladder according to their values)

   2. from left to right Archbishop,Queen,Chancellor (nicknamed classic balanced-because the queen is in the middle and the two halves of the board are more balanced in strength)

   3. from left to right Chancellor,Archbishop,Queen (nicknamed horned unbalanced- because of the archbishop way of movement and the two halves of the board are more unbalanced in strength)

   4. from left to right Chancellor,Queen,Archbishop (nicknamed classic unbalanced- because the queen is in the middle and the two halves of the board are more unbalanced in strength)

   5. from left to right Queen,Archbishop,Chancellor (nicknamed horned balanced-because of the archbishop way of movement and the two halves of the board are more balanced in strength)

   6. from left to right Queen,Chancellor,Archbishop (nicknamed reversed ladder-because pieces are on a reversed ladder according to their values)

4. The classic minor pieces are the bishops and knights. They start on the 2nd (for white) and 9th (for black) rank, never on the a or j files in the spots left free by the major pieces. They too have two ways of arranging that could be represented by a coin toss. The first way is named bishops in (true,1,heads) and means the bishops are in the positions closer to the king (c2,h2,c9,h9 in grand classic, d2,g2,d9,g9 in winged). The second way is named knights in (false,0,tails) and means that the knights are in the above mentioned closer to the king position. So two coin tosses and one dice throw means 2x2x6=24 possibilities.

5. The new minor pieces are the elephants,the camel and the zebra. They start in the bruhaha squares which are temporary squares set outside the normal board. These squares are: d0,e0,f0,g0,d11,e11,f11,g11. The d files are always filled by zebras,the g files are always filled by camels and the d and e files are always filled by elephants. On the bruhaha squares the zebra and the camel receive the two forward (2,2) alfil moves and (3,3) threaper moves. Also on their bruhaha squares the elephants receive the (4,0) forward move and the two (4,1) most forward moves. All the move abilities specific to the bruhaha squares are move-only, no capture. The other moves are like anywhere on the board.

6. The joker (jester,fool) piece starts in pocket. It may be placed on the board as part of a first move of any non-pawn non-new minor piece on the board by placing the joker on the just vacated spot by the just moved piece. This can be done up until turn 12 (including 12) by white and turn 18 (including 18) by black. This turn difference is done to ballance the first move advantage.

7. Pawns fill the third rank of each player (3rd rank for white, 8th rank for black)

The starting positions are numbered from 1 to 24. A position is obtained throgh the formula 12xclassicminor+6xmajor+dicethrow. For example below we have initial position number 14. Notice the jokers in the pocket squares.Also notice the pink Bruhaha squares.



This game has 25 pieces per side of 12 different types (king and pawns included). From the perspective of strength the pieces are split in 5 categories:

1. Major pieces - they are the strongest in the game; there are 3 major pieces:

Queen- like orthodox chess queen on a 10x10 board

Chancellor- moves as an orthodox knight and an orthodox rook

Archbishop- moves as an orthodox knight and an orthodox bishop

2. Average pieces - just the rook

Rook- just an orthodox rook on a 10x10 board

3. Joker pieces

Joker (Jester, Fool)- Average piece in the opening;the strength of this piece is highly dependent on the opponents material. The joker (jester,fool) imitates the power movement and capture of the last piece moved by the opponent. Be careful as opposite to the advanced  omega chess fool, from which the concept is taken, the apothecary joker doesn't immobilize pieces .

Bishop- like an orthodox bishop on a 10x10 board

knight- an orthodox knight with a treaper just move enhancement (i.e. jump for movement and not capture three squares diagonally)

Elephant- has the powers of the ferz (one step diagonally), alfil (jump two squares diagonally) and just the move power of the threeleaper (jumps three squares orthogonal)

Zebra- has the powers of the classic zebra (a (3,2) leaper i.e jumps to all squares 2 squares far in one direction and 3 squares far in the other) and the just move power of the ferz (one square diagonally)

Camel- has the powers of the classic camel from Tamerlane chess (a (3,1) leaper i.e jumps to all squares 1 square far in one direction and 3 squares far in the other) and the just move power of the wazir (one square orthogonal)

Pawns - classic chess pawns on a 10x10 board from the point of view of movement and capture but that may promote starting the 8th rank according to piece categories. Pawns promote to any minor piece on the players 8th rank, any minor piece or rook at the 9th rank, and any minor piece,rook or any major piece at rank 10. Notice that pawns may never promote to joker.

King- Not in a category; an orthodox chess king on a 10x10 board- the royal piece of this game


By far the main difference between the rules of classic chess and the rules of apothecary chess 2 is that apothecary chess 2 has five instead of three possible outcomes:
1. win - obtained through checkmating your opponent which worths 1 tournament point
2. advantage - obtained through stalemating your opponent or having at least 4 points in the points counting process (see bellow) worths 0.75 tournament points
3. draw - obtained through double bare kings or through having at most 3 ahead points in the points counting process (see bellow) worths 0.5 tournament points
4. disadvantage- when your opponent finishes at an advantage still worths 0.25 tournament points
5. loss - you got checkmated
At any time players may give up (loss) or convene at a draw or advantage/disadvantage.

Point count occurs in two situations:
1. The 100 moves rule takes charge (akin to the 50th moves rule of orthodox chess but after 100 moves) i.e. 100 moves have taken place and no captures or pawn pushes happened.
2. An position has been repeated three times.

When point count occurs points are awarded to each player for each non king piece the player has on the board. A major piece worths 9 points. A rook worths 6 points. A minor piece worths 3 points. A fool worths 5 points if the opponent has exactly more major pieces than minor pieces left on the board. It worth 4 point otherwise.A pawn on the 9th rank worth 7 points. A pawn on the 8th rank worth 4 points. A pawn not on the 8th or 9th rank worth 1 point. If one player counts at least 4 more points than it's opponent then the game end in an advantage for him. Otherwise a draw is awarded to both players.

There is no castling in this game. The en passant rule is as usual only that pawns have the double move from the 3rd to the 5th player's rank.



During the developement of the game I kept in touch with several persons including Greg Strong, H.G.Muller and Vickalan Reinhart. Espepecially to Greg and HG I owe a debt of gratitude for providing software that help me develope the game concepts. I have used HG Muller's Fairy-MAX to measure properly piece values, although that is still in the beginning phases. I have used Greg Strong's chessV in order to implement the weirder promotion rule and the joker piece, and test a bit the game.
Here are the proposed piece values as I used them in ChessV.
Pawn        800
zebra        2900
camel        3025
knight        3050
bishop        3400
elephant    3500
rook        5750
archbishop    7500
chancellor    8000
queen        9000

These values are acording to preliminary measurements and aer subject to discussion. In the lower part of the spectrum they are better measured as I've put more time there.
The piece notations I advice are:
Pawn        P,p
zebra        Z,z
camel        L,l
knight        N,n
bishop        B,b
elephant    E,e
rook        R,r
archbishop    A,a
Chancellor    C,c
queen        Q,q
Joker        J,j
King        K,k

There are many ways of establishing handicap but as the inventor of this game I must advise against large handicaps. If the strength gap is to large than maybe you should choose different opponents. Here is a list of what I considered acceptable handicaps from smallest to largest accepted.
1. Move handicap- either white starts with two moves or black does two moves without capturing anything the first time when it is his turn (so it can preserve the 18th turn joker placement advantage)
2. Pawn handicap- a pawn is added to the handicap receiver's 4th rank. The closer the pawn to the middle of the board the larger the handicap.
3. Bishops vs 2 pawns handicap - The handicap giver removes a bishop but adds two pawns on the 4th rank. If those pawns are connected than the handicap is smaller, also if the pawns are closer to the middle of the board.
4. Rook vs 3 pawns handicap- same ideea- The handicap giver removes a rook but adds two pawns on the 4th rank. Also the handicap receiver removes a pawn. Various pawn arrangements lead to various tunnings of this handicap.

I know ussually in odds games pieces are not added but I like this way better. Time odds are also possible.

And a bit of self criticism. The knight's just jump treaper move is a bit too long, also even the zebra move is too long for such a small board. Those moves were obtained through tinkering and so they are not very apropriate for the game. Also in my first unpublished yet game I ever invented was an 18x18, by comparison this board is tiny. Point being that when I first invented the game I was very happy with the zebra as a piece and I had not forseen it's akwardness.
Even if a bit akward I noticed through play that the zebra can deliver interesting forks (basically everything is stronger than a zebra)  so it's properties are here to stay.
The 24 initial positions are chosen from an uniform distribution for now. If the game becomes studied and more openings are found from certain initial positions then the probability distribution will be adjusted acordingly so the richer initial positions come up slightly more often.

This 'user submitted' page is a collaboration between the posting user and the Chess Variant Pages. Registered contributors to the Chess Variant Pages have the ability to post their own works, subject to review and editing by the Chess Variant Pages Editorial Staff.

By Aurelian Florea.
Web page created: 2017-04-26. Web page last updated: 2017-04-26