[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Rated Comments for a Single ItemLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ Earlier Abecedarian Big Chess (ABChess). Buy-your-own-army variant on a big board; 26 piece types. (11x11, Cells: 121) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Psy-T wrote on 2006-07-09 UTCExcellent ★★★★★I am really enjoying this game, played 2 rounds so far against a friend online (on Zillions). Thanks a lot for creating it :) My favorite set up is AUZWCKCWZUA so far. Let us know when someone decides to make this a physical board game, i'd definitely purchase a set ;) -Alon. M. Howe wrote on 2002-11-14 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Now that I've played a little ABChess with the zrf (nice job!) I like the game a lot. It has a terrific Xiang-Qi-like feel to it with lots of new tactical possibilities provided by the new pieces. I'm still not sure about the effect of knightriders on opening play, though, and I don't like the anti-positional nature of the teleporter piece. I also have some thoughts about the piece values. I think the teleporter, pao, and rook are overvalued, and I think the varan, unicorn, wildebeest, and eagle are undervalued. But that's one opinion, and a consensus opinion based on a lot more experience is what's needed. Orthodox chess evaluations will not apply to this game, in light of the pawn rules and the king's fortress. Also, I tried several Zillions vs. Zillions games of 'Marshal Varan vs. Two Queens' and white won 5 out of 6 games. That's a small sample and might not be significant, but it might mean that a little more work needs to be done to balance games between unmatching armies. Of course, in games between matching armies, piece values and army balance becomes much less critical. Despite these criticisms, offered and taken, I hope, in a constructive spirit, I like ABChess enormously. It's a game I'm sure I will keep going back to. M. Howe wrote on 2002-11-11 UTCGood ★★★★I agree that the rank of yeomen prevents nightriders from making captures on turn one. But after a yeoman has moved, such as on turn one, a first-rank nightrider can attack and pin one enemy yeomen. I'm not saying that this breaks the game, but I prefer games in which white, on his first move, cannot threaten or pin black. I also wonder about the accelerated promotion of yeomen. They can promote after only three moves. Will this make the game too tactical and deprive it of some interesting endgames? I guess I'll have to play the ZRF to know for sure how this all works out. Anonymous wrote on 2002-11-11 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Fantastic! I love this variant from the start. Now I'm thinking of 'translating' it to german, keeping the ABC theme intact ... probably I'll have to exchange a few pieces ... and since the pawns can be made 'no letter' there is room for a 25th piece to buy. --JKn M. Howe wrote on 2002-11-10 UTCGood ★★★★Without having played it yet, my first impressions are very good. I really like the idea of a large variant played from a superset of pieces, and I'm working on such a variant myself right now. The point values might have to be adjusted as more experience is gained in using these pieces, and a problem might arise because those values are almost certainly not constant, but probably depend to one degree or another on which other pieces are present in the given game. I'm reserving a little bit of judgement, also, in case some of the pieces, particularly those with nightrider components, have an unbalancing effect on the opening. I've always had a hard time incorporating nightriders into my own variants and have for the most part abandoned them. But I can't wait to play the ZRF! Jianying Ji wrote on 2002-11-10 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Really well designed and explained large variant without the clutter that often afflict them 6 comments displayedLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ EarlierPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.