[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Rated Comments for a Single ItemLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ Earlier The One Ring. White wants to get the Ring to the far side and destroy it. (5x8, Cells: 42) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Charles Gilman wrote on 2004-01-06 UTCExcellent ★★★★★I was about to make three possible suggestions to solve the unprotected Pawns problem, all with 3 Pawns between the outer 2 Pawns together with: nothing between the Knights (same material as current variant); 3 Pawns between the Knights AS WELL (same material as FIDE Chess); Knight-Camel-Camel-Gnu-Knight (reduced-Pawns version of Wildebeest Chess). Then I realised that all Pawns ARE protected: the inner ones by the Queen and Bishops, and the outer ones by the inner ones (and should those move, by the Bishop behind them). Still, the other variants might be interesting as well. Tomas Forsman wrote on 2002-05-07 UTCExcellent ★★★★★I must say that I have fell in love with this game. You say in your description that you don't like the setup of the pieces but I enjoy them very much. The consept of the one ring is wonderful and really adds to the game. I am just about to download the bigger version as well and find out why you like that even more then the smaller one. Congrats on a wonderful variant. Tomas Forsman 2 comments displayedLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ EarlierPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.