Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
As recalled, there may be explicitly only Capablanca Random, Fischer Random, and Falcon Random Chess, though some other CVs provide for varying backrank. Fischer died in 2008 9 years ago -- you can always remember because he lived *64* years, if you know date of birth 1943.
Nowadays there is an F.I.D.E. policy, juvenile or dangerous as it seems, of squelching so much as mention of CVs except for the two national forms from Japan and China. Fischer and the few FRC adherents, such as through CVPage since, have never named (in words that is) the supposed 40 or 80 preferred initial set-ups. Apparently they do not think it important enough, and their reference Fischer Random is more or less lip service though there is some regular play at Game Courier. Whereas, in Falcon Random Chess, utilizing the four fundamentals, not just the three, all 80 and more important arrays have been named for five or seven years. For example, Nanook Rook is BFNQRRKNFB and Folk Falcon is NBRQFFKRBN. With either form, Simpleminded 8x8 or full-size 80 squares (fewer than Shogi), the 80 or so starting positions each recommended are enough to make programming something of a headache for a while since openings do figure into results.
For other probably better ways to thwart computers, see follow-up comments at the topic "Computer Resistant CVs" but changing randomly start position is one partial solution.
Actually BrainKing still plays CVs and I will use my membership there, in abeyance a year or two, to catch up what is getting played most.
Of the 96 arrays only of interest over a dozen are named. Here are some new brand namings: RFBQNNKBFR Nutty Knights, RBFQNNKFBR Naughty Knights, FRBQNNKBRF Knotty Knights, FBRQNNKRBF Neato Knights, BRFQNNKFRB Needy Knights, BFRQNNKRFB Nighty-Knights. A few more, total of 18, where Knights situate at e- and f- all are recalled by 'n's and linguistic-equivalent 't/d's. Each one of 96 will have a name in comprehensive list by ongoing add-ons to 19-year-old FRC (so named after yr. 2000).
10 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
It is better in principle to protect all Pawns in array. Each of the 96 starting line-ups have a name, some offhandedly sprinkled around comments in several articles. A dozen or two -- they have to be counted up again -- do have all guarded Pawns initially. Of those some are nevertheless ugly with King and Queen in abc/hij files. The two most favored arrays Old-Standard RNBF and Sibahi RFNB do not do so. The first is played 47 times in Game Courier now and second 12 times, and other arrays of the same game 3 more times, a total of 62. However, I have played in all but few of those.
http://www.chessvariants.com/index/listcomments.php?id=17706. Following is reference to arrays that do protect all Pawns:Pawn_Protect. Somewhere we surveyed the large Chesses and found about 20% of 300 do not protect all Pawns, and am looking for that comment; if not found will cite several examples of respected games with incomplete array-coverage that way.
In "91.5 Trillion..." the goal was to avoid prolicificism and to generate millions/trillions of CVs formulaically. It is inelegant to deal in specific write-ups one by one. Many_CVs. There only one of the Mutators hinges on starting set-ups varying.