[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Comments/Ratings for a Single Item Later ⇩Reverse Order⇧ Earlier Tim's 4x8x4 3D Chess . A practical and playable 3D chess game.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Tim O\'Lena wrote on 2004-05-22 UTCWhere can I find the applet you are referring to? Armin wrote on 2004-04-06 UTCThis game is fun! You can take all of the opponents pieces-including the king-and then the applet cannot move any black pieces, and you cannot move since it is blacks turn. Still, it must be hard to make an applet so I'm not going to say it's bad (and its seriously isn't). Also, I moved my rook infront of the king, checking it, and the King moved diagonally into another check instead of forward and taking my rook :). It's fun to mess around with the computer! Tim O'Lena wrote on 2003-10-19 UTCThe King and Queen may use the triagonal (3D diagonal) in this variant. Charles Gilman wrote on 2003-10-19 UTCOne more question. Am I right in understanding that the triagonal move is not used in this game? Charles Gilman wrote on 2003-04-19 UTCGood ★★★★That is a sensible use of two Kings. In fact a King fork would be checkmate even if both Kings CAN escape check (as long as the checking piece cannot be captured), as whichever one is moved leaves the other in check. Tim O'Lena wrote on 2003-04-18 UTCCheckmating one King wins the game. The idea is to make wins more likely and draws less likely. Note that a King fork is considered 'mate' if the forking piece is immune from capture. This is because you only have one move and need to protect BOTH Kings. Charles Gilman wrote on 2003-04-18 UTCDoes the same rule apply as in your 5x5x5 game, that checkmating one king wins the game even if the other is safe? 7 comments displayedLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ EarlierPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.