Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

~~Later~~ ⇩Reverse Order⇧ ~~Earlier~~

3 Man Chess: Review. Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Mar 15, 2006 04:52 AM UTC:

Cool-looking set. Though trying to visualize diagonal moves through the center makes me kind of dizzy.

Roger Crow wrote on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 03:34 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

I, for one, happen to own a similar 3-man chess variant similar to this, and I think that this is an interesting variant. Well done.

Charles Gilman wrote on Fri, Mar 5, 2004 07:10 AM UTC:

Shaiful seems have misunderstood the 'rating' section. It is supposed to be what the person commenting thinks of the page and/or the game or piece that it describes, not their own proficiency at the game. That is why it is meaningful to average them to an 'overall rating'.

SHAIFUL wrote on Wed, Nov 20, 2002 02:11 PM UTC:Poor ★

I AM NOT GOOD AT THIS

4 comments displayed

~~Later~~ ⇩Reverse Order⇧ ~~Earlier~~

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.