[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Comments/Ratings for a Single Item Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later 3 Man Chess: Review. Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]SHAIFUL wrote on 2002-11-20 UTCPoor ★I AM NOT GOOD AT THIS Charles Gilman wrote on 2004-03-05 UTCShaiful seems have misunderstood the 'rating' section. It is supposed to be what the person commenting thinks of the page and/or the game or piece that it describes, not their own proficiency at the game. That is why it is meaningful to average them to an 'overall rating'. Roger Crow wrote on 2005-12-29 UTCGood ★★★★I, for one, happen to own a similar 3-man chess variant similar to this, and I think that this is an interesting variant. Well done. Anonymous wrote on 2006-03-15 UTCCool-looking set. Though trying to visualize diagonal moves through the center makes me kind of dizzy. 4 comments displayedEarlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ LaterPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.