Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
Doug Chatham wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2006 02:53 PM UTC:
In many chess variants (e.g Grand Chess 2) pawn promotion is restricted to pieces captured by the opponent. Why? Why is this restriction so popular among chess variants?

A related question: Has anyone tried turning this particular restriction around, restricting pawn promotion to those piece-types that have not been lost? (i.e., if you lose a Queen, you couldn't get it back through promotion, and if you lost both Knights, you couldn't get them back.)


David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2006 03:44 PM UTC:
Expensive wooden chess sets sometimes include extra queens (1 White, 1
Black), allowing you to properly enjoy famous games that had four queens
on the board.  The Alekhine - Capablanca WCC Match had one such game.

Doug, I have always wondered why limited promotion rules became popular at
the same time as chess playing computers - which have no difficulty in
putting any number of queens on the display screen.  As for your 'rule
reversal', King and Pawns endings would become pointless.

Doug Chatham wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2006 04:43 PM UTC:
David,
Yeah, King-and-Pawn endings would be a problem with my 'promote-only-to-live-species' rule. Either one would have to make some sort of exception, like 'When there's nothing left but Pawns and Kings, then you can promote to anything' or 'A Pawn can always promote to a ..er.. Man' -- or one would have to somehow shorten the game so that Pawn-and-King endgames never occurred (e.g Extinction Chess, which follows my rule in a trivial sense).

[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
Judd Smith wrote on Sun, Oct 8, 2006 06:21 PM UTC:

I was taught that when a pawn promotes, it can 'attack diagonally' into the final row, giving the promoted piece a degree of protection.

I've reviewed the rules.

They are absolutely silent on this notion.

I do not, even in the slightest degree, like...what I suspect to be the case. Pawns definitely should have this power.

PLEASE POST YOUR RULING TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS:

[email protected]


Andy the First wrote on Sun, Oct 8, 2006 11:39 PM UTC:
Your question is not even coherent enough to answer.

Joe Joyce wrote on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 12:06 AM UTC:
Judd, you are apparently asking if a pawn can move diagonally forward when
moving from the 7th to the 8th rank. Unless it is capturing an opponent's
piece, the answer is no. A standard FIDE pawn may never move diagonally
forward unless it is capturing. There are other types of pawns that may
move diagonally forward, such as the Berolina pawn, but they have their
own limitations.

[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
George Duke wrote on Thu, Feb 25, 2010 09:13 PM UTC:
Flowerman is interested in promotion, 
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=25122.
These comments do not exhaust the
possibilities,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=25066. Is Upchess about promotion or just morphing:
http://chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?itemid=Upchess?
Here there are three zones; Pawns promote normally but pieces promote, or morph, on the inside,
http://www.chessvariants.org/large.dir/contest/bigouter.html, in Big Outer.
Zelig Chess and M-Chess are related to Upchess, basing the metamorphoses on files:
http://www.chessvariants.org/diffmove.dir/mchess.html,
http://www.chessvariants.org/diffmove.dir/zeligchess.html.  
But the Querquisite has the relative antiquity of 1947.
And Pocket Mutation, http://www.chessvariants.org/large.dir/pocketmutation.html, was once played.

7 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.