Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

~~Earlier~~ ⇧Reverse Order⇩ ~~Later~~

Andy Thomas wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 06:08 AM UTC:

hi,
i have gotten a working .zrf file for what i had previously described as,
'21st century chess'... 

seeing as how that title was taken, i have renamed it, 'operational
chess' instead...

i would like to upload the .zrf but instead thought some of you here might
want to take a look at it and comment first.

is that how it should be done, or should it simply be sent it off to
[email protected] and offered for download that way?


thanks

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 10:09 AM UTC:

there is nothing wrong in doing what you are doing, it can only help the
game, if you end making changes because of anything anyone says
especially.
looks pretty bizarre, i'll be checking it out real soon. i did have to
move the zrf to where the bmp's are though to get it to work. 
(will email ya) .. looks really good actually ...

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 04:17 PM UTC:

ok i havn't studied the pieces yet, first i just watched zillions vs
zillions, first game blue won, played cool, second game, red got
advantage, 4 trains to 3, but that was as far as it got, after lots of
moves and pieces staying same, it was going to be a draw, i had to end
it.
of course i'll be testing more, it looks great, i like idea of trains
being royal, and winning by capturing all trains, i am just wondering, if
after a certain amount of moves, person with most trains wins, or a draw,
like your americanchess 50 move rule.
you would know more, having play tested more, i will know more about what
i am saying in a few days. also, i am not saying that after 50 moves some
result should be attained, this game is bigger than 'american', so it
would have to be higher, no doubt.
but overall, yep, looks really good

3 comments displayed

~~Earlier~~ ⇧Reverse Order⇩ ~~Later~~

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.