[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
I have fixed the error. The answer to 'Who cares?' is people who wonder how I came up with the particular array that I did. If some consensus emerges as to where background details should go on this page I will happily go along with them.
I think there is supposed to be an Aircraft image for the ACE, instead of the Marshall image presently shown. As for the game itself, it appears that a great deal of thought has gone into its design. At a glance, it seems to be extremely challenging and original. I cannot rate the game accurately at present as I have not played it or seen it played... but I would not be surprised if it turns out to be a very good game... and so for now will go with my conservative hunch of 'good.' In regard to another comment about towns and lots of verbage in the intro, perhaps that text could be condensed in the intro, but be presented in its entirety (or even further expanded) as an Appendix at the end of the notes? That way players that don't care about historical or theoretical detail can skip it (won't even see it up front) while those who like such information can eagerly skip to the Appendix in the notes section.
A really overly-complicated game for which strategy and planning will be very obscure. And who cares what English town each file stands for? This is just self-indulgence. It seems like Charles Gilman just wants to make as many CVs as possible and therefore makes a lot of bad ones.
3 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.