[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Comments/Ratings for a Single Item Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later Stalemate chess. Missing description (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Simon Jepps wrote on 2010-08-19 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Heh, what a simple but very interesting twist to the standard game. Congratulations. Claudio Martins Jaguaribe wrote on 2010-08-19 UTCNow Daniil, if you read my variant (Har Meggido) or the making off, you'll understand my hate (LOL) Hugs! Will Egan wrote on 2013-02-19 UTCEntertaining. This means a lone queen can beat a king, king and two knights wins, king and two bishops might not win (and same with king and rook) H. G. Muller wrote on 2013-02-19 UTCWhy do you think that? Stalemating with Rook (i.e. KRK) is totally trivial. If you have the power to checkmate, stalemating should be a piece of cake. 4 comments displayedEarlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ LaterPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.