Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Rated Comments for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
Dave's Silly Example Game. This is Dave Howe's example of a user-posted game. (2x2, Cells: 4) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
John Lawson wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2005 06:36 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
So where do I go to see posted games to approve them? Maybe put a link on the Minimal New page? (This is where I always start a visit to the CVP.)

Michael Nelson wrote on Sun, May 1, 2005 04:05 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
The system works quite well. I was able to recreate a page for Decima with
my revisions in about 45 minutes.

When it is approved, would it be possible for an editor to append the
original Decima comments to it and then remove the original Decima page?

Greg Strong wrote on Sun, May 1, 2005 04:16 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Yes, the page-submission system is definitely excellent! I was able to get Opulent Chess up in a matter of minutes. I suspect a LOT of games will be posted in the future ...

Alan Redgown wrote on Tue, Jan 3, 2006 08:33 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Awesome game! I've got to try it sometime!

Jeremy Good wrote on Sat, Jun 23, 2007 02:44 AM UTC:Poor ★
Pieces are too cramped and Queens on a 2 x 2 board make for an overpowered game. Kings have no opportunity for creating luft, nor can they move out of checkmate. Rules are overly restrictive: Prohibition against captures makes for a boring game and absence of legal moves makes games too short and deciding the victor too confusing. Also size of game blurs difference in powers of pieces, making for too much monotony. Game might benefit from more squares and pieces, less restrictive rules.

5 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.