[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Rated Comments for a Single ItemLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ Earlier Lilliputian Monochromatic Alice Chess. All pieces are colorbound, and switch boards rather than switching color. (6x7x2, Cells: 84) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Tony Quintanilla wrote on 2003-02-20 UTCExcellent ★★★★★What makes it unique, the double board, the pieces being color-bound on each board, the board switching, take a little getting used to. However, the rules are very clear and once the logic starts to become more intuitive, the game is very playable. The piece strength compared to the board size appears well suited to the game. Very nice game. Ian J wrote on 2002-12-21 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Peter, thanks for the explanation - I just didn't read the rules carefully enough! Another way of saying it is that all captures are made on the same board as the piece starts on and can only be made, in the case of an off-color capture, if the corresponding square on the other board is empty. The possibilty of having pieces occupying the equivalent square on both boards is intriguing. E.g. the White king could be on 2f1, the black king on 1f1 and then the white king would be mated by a black cardinal on 2b5 as it couldn't move to the other board because of the presence of the black king - or does the rule about kings not being able to be next to each other no longer apply due to the fact they couldn't capture each other as they're on different color squares? Anyway, assuming it still holds, a black cardinal on 2e3 wouldn't check as it could never move to that square. Great game- sorry about these questions but I'm really trying to get this as it has such promise. Jianying Ji wrote on 2002-11-27 UTCExcellent ★★★★★excellent game, one of the illustration has the wrong coloring for the squares. The second set in the middle of the page, board2 should have the opposing coloring Joseph DiMuro wrote on 2002-11-27 UTCExcellent ★★★★★Man. Every time I think I've figured out which game is the best, someone else comes up with another winner. I don't know how the judges are going to decide this one... :-) gnohmon wrote on 2002-11-27 UTCExcellent ★★★★★I would give it a higher rating, but it only goes up to excellent. Just one thing, though... 'You may capture a piece on a square of the other color than the capturing piece is bound to,' this phrase baffles me, especially because there are no colorbound pieces. Mike Nelson wrote on 2002-11-27 UTCExcellent ★★★★★A very pretty design. The game also seems highly playable. A possible sub-variant of the double game: a four player game where partners use the same color on opposite boards. The turn order might be White board 1, Black board 1, White board 2, Black board 2. If there were no pieces of the correct color on the correct board, that turn would be skipped. 6 comments displayedLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ EarlierPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.