Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
To the user who asked why castling is not allowed: Castling is allowed on ICC (www.chessclub.com), but I don't know about anywhere else. This page should at least say that castling is sometimes allowed.
The editors received the following correspondence from Doron Singer: Your example claims Bxc1 wins. It, in fact, loses, which goes to show suicide chess is deeper than what most people give it credit for. Black's win is as follows: 1. Bxc1 g5 2. Bxg5 a6 3. Bxe7 axb5 now: 4. Bxf8 Nc6 5. Bxb5 Nd7 6. Bxd7 Ra3 7. Bxa3 b4 8. Bxb4 0-1 or: 5. Bxc5 Ra3 if: 6. Bxf8 Nd7 and so on and if: 6. Bxa3 Nc6 and so on. Doron.
- International rules: Specify that stalemated player wins. (Condition of no pieces remaining is not necessary because having 0 pieces already means no moves available)
- AISE rules: Specify player with 0 pieces remaining wins (stalemate is draw by default).
- FICS rules: The count-condition in Zillions can only specify whoever has more pieces wins, not loses. So, what you can do, is specify that each player moves his opponent's pieces: (turn-order (White Black) (Black White))
- Ebenfelt's variant: Turn off stalemate checking. Set option 'pass turn' forced.
Suicide Chess Solution for E2E4 open move is incomplete! If knight does not move B1C3, but white player makes move with other piece there is a big chance White wins : ) (G2-G3 Pawn for example seems like move which ruins the whole solution) Please if someone knows where I can find the whole solution write to pnk at abv dot bg. Thank U
I would like to invite everyone to try my free "Suicide Chess" aplication at http://suicidechessgame.webs.com/ Please if you have comments or recommendations share them. Thank you for your time
Free Giveaway Chess ("Suicide chess") Windows Pnone App at: http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/app/suicide-chess-free/b89dc1a3-2d23-410d-b580-aaaff54d81f5 I will be very happy if you like it !!!
This was the first chess variant I'd ever heard of, way back in elementary school around 1970. After trying it a few times I disliked a game that would rely heavily on giving away stuff to the opponent in order to win. Looking at the variant's webpage nowadays, I can see this variant has depth, in spite of my still not liking it much as far as the thought of playing it myself. The extensive opening theory that apparently one needs to know to survive (in any sense) against strong losing chess players looks daunting, and I'm a bit disappointed that the traditional and obvious chess centre pawn moves 1.e4 and 1.d4 are thought to lose for White in this variant. So, not my cup of tea (at least at present) but I can see how this variant and its basic concept might attract many other people to it.
20 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.