Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest
Feedback to the Chess Variant Pages - How to contactus. Including information on editors and associate authors of the website.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Anonymous wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2012 01:14 PM UTC:BelowAverage ★★

kunglao wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 10:19 PM UTC:BelowAverage ★★

Joe Joyce wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 09:46 PM UTC:
Jeremy, email me directly at the address given in my person ID - click on my name to the left.

Jeremy Lennert wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 07:50 PM UTC:
I sent an email to the general contact listed on this page over 3 weeks ago and never got a response. Is that address current?

Ed wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 10:39 PM UTC:
Dear Editor,

I found an image of a Chinese chess variant
(http://www.hudong.com/versionview/idl,pAUWBxBWVKVEd2U,kVZZA) that I don't
recognize and wonder if you know what one it is.  I have searched on your
website but have found nothing similar.

From what I can see, the board has been lengthened by two ranks on each
side of the river, the extended range of the elephant inscribed on the
board, and the governor used for both sides as the royal piece in the
fortress; the generals (two per side) are positioned for a new function, it
seems, outside the fortress.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Carol Springgay wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 05:24 PM UTC:
Just to say that David Springgay dropped out of the chess scene to have a family !

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Fri, Sep 9, 2011 09:24 PM UTC:
He can capture one of your pieces only if that remove check.

Terence wrote on Fri, Sep 9, 2011 10:58 AM UTC:
If i have put my oponent in check can he take my play or must he move out of check

Danilo J Bonsignore wrote on Tue, Apr 5, 2011 07:07 AM UTC:BelowAverage ★★
WRONG! This connection does not have SMTP enabled. Already wrote to the chess federation in form... you should have a general form or at least a mailto: variant. It is an alternative version for classical chess in google groups in the chess politics group. Since it is already subjected to some competition? impersonation... there is another chess variants chess page but do not have time to look for it right now. I would also try programming in zillions but it would take too much time off my programming time. Incidentally I have been unable to make java work in this laptop... (Really a pathological guy? Is he really sane?)

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Feb 17, 2011 05:44 AM UTC:
How do you castle?

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 12:33 AM UTC:
Yes, you can checkmate him with only a King and a Rook.

bob house wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 09:55 PM UTC:
i am in a game where my opponent has only his king left and i have a king and a rook, am i able to checkmate him with only these pieces or should we call it a draw?

George Duke wrote on Wed, Dec 8, 2010 05:05 PM UTC:
Not having checked outside, as for CVs, the Three-Player Chesses, regardless 2-d or not, all of them would be cooperative, tilted to competitive, back and forth. The idea should be put again at one of those like Zubrin's for feedback. Just make some off-hand reference to Zubrin's or whoever's and ramify your contemplated offshoot ''from the heart.'' I have reaction already that would be inappropriate here but interesting at Heiser 2-d, Zubrin 2-d, or a related 3-d etc. There even would be context. (Maybe the one Star Trek comment of Fourcell does not compare/contrast.) Noticing Fourcell's emphasis is equally 3-d and cooperative, to start, along with Star Trek there are over 100 3-d CVs in CVPage index; find the one that's right for you heh.

Kenneth Fourcell wrote on Wed, Dec 8, 2010 08:14 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I found your comments very, uh -- interesting and sobering, and yet in my heart I believe I have a great idea; unfortunately no funding. I wont say much more but only ask that you look at what I have invented and patented, your most critical opinion would be most appriciated.

[email protected]  email
www.3dchesstower.com  web site

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Oct 18, 2010 09:03 PM UTC:
i hate it

Francois Tremblay wrote on Mon, Aug 30, 2010 07:02 AM UTC:
I think you guys never replied to my latest email. Maybe it's down or something? Just in case, I will post my question here. I've recently become interested in cooperative abstract games and I would like to hold a chess variant contest on that theme (cooperative or semi-cooperative variants), if you like the idea. As far as I know, there are none on this site and I think it would be very interesting to see what people would come up with.

Barra Antonio wrote on Thu, Jul 15, 2010 07:38 PM UTC:
Hi! I've seen that on Korean chess page is difficult to swap Knight with Elephant. Please help me. Regards. Antonio

tony ohagan wrote on Tue, Jul 13, 2010 06:23 AM UTC:
Thanks Joe. I am just starting to get involved with people who invent games. Its a tough business from what I've seen and it doesn't seem that rewarding [ money wise ]. The biggest plus in my opinion is the inventors. Your quality and spark are a lighthouse in the fog. 
I am still interested in talking to Jeff and Mark from Zillions. Would you know how to contact them. I tried contacting them at the site but my email came back as failed.
You mentioned that there are some matters that would not be appropriate on this forum. My email is [email protected]. Please feel free to contact me at that address. Looking forward to hearing from you and thanks again for your help.

Joe Joyce wrote on Tue, Jul 13, 2010 02:58 AM UTC:
Hi, Tony:

Being involved in trying to get a small board game company off the ground myself, and just beginning to learn my way around the very bottom of the NY metro area game industry, I have to tell you I know that most efforts fail, and in particular, chess variants are a great way to fill your garage or basement with unsold merchandise. It is extremely difficult to make money with a chess variant. I've been involved with IAGO [Int'l Abstract Game Org] for a few years now, and have met or dealt with several people who had 'the next chess'. [None regulars on this site.] None of them have, or we'd know about it. 

Okay, that's the disclaimer, and it's all true. Please look into the industry before you invest. Given all that, I started by saying I am doing a small boardgame company, and have found out a few things. Yes, the hard way, or a hard way, certainly, in every case. I will lay out a few things for anyone who is interested, then ask you to email me, as anything more than I will say generally here would be outside the scope of this website. 

When you are making a board game, for an idea of cost, you need to be guided by the purpose of the board game(s) you are actually making. Are you prototyping, creating a small number for playtesting and advertising, or going whole hog, and making 5-10,000 games or more? And why are you doing it? What is your budget? Let me put that another way: how much can you afford to lose on this? Expect to lose [except secretly] and fight to win. They say determination is important. 

Let's look at those numbers of games another way. How will you manage to get all of those games sold/used? First, build the prototype. This you should do yourself, and the very first attempt should be paper and pencil. [This does include things like colored pens and stickers and game bits just lying around, unused, suffocating in their boxes...] It just needs to be good enough to show your buddy or brother or cousin, and get them to play some to test the concept. If they don't sink it, draw up around 3 of the very best but very minimalist boards you can, to the exact size you would want 10,000 of them done professionally. [This is often determined by packaging constraints.] Then put together about 5 sets of the best-looking pieces you can, and start playtesting in earnest. 

If initial playtesting goes very well, your next step might be to produce 25 or so semi-professional to professional-grade good-looking games. Get them out to game groups to play and get comments. Do demos and leave a game with contact info and questionnaires. Follow up within a month. Run contests/tournaments at places like cons and game stores or wherever your target audiences hang out. This gets all the bugs worked out and gives you some idea of how the public likes it. 

Assuming things go well, you want to do a small to very small production run, say 100-1000 games. There are boutique companies you can use, but they are expensive. At that level, you might have to do it yourself, or pay/go into partnership with someone who already has a small game company. You become your own distribution system, trying to sell your games at conventions and to game stores, and it isn't at all easy. What you're doing at this level is trying to make a name for yourself and draw some attention from an established company... who will pick up your game and sell it far better than you could, and you'll still probably only make pennies per game. But that doesn't happen all that often. 

All the cheap Chinese companies want to do minimum runs. The minimum sizes I saw were 5000-20,000 games. This is a largish run. How will you distribute these games? The big toy companies have contracts with thousands of stores to show their items, so when they make something, it is already going nationwide in stores. With advertising. Don't do this. Go back to 100 games. Make and sell those. Then either quit, change your methods, or make and sell another 100 or more. Your key to volume sales is distribution network, and that means hooking up with someone bigger, realistically. The games you produce have to be good enough to help that happen.

Prices? For the initial prototypes, under $10-20 dollars - plus travel costs to show it off. The 25 decent games would be maybe $200 - a few hundred. The 100 pro-looking games might go $2000 - a few thou. This all depends on size and components, and quality of components. These are roughly my costs for things from 1 to 100. After that, the Chinese are a few tens of thousands. Again, it depends heavily on components and quality.

tony ohagan wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2010 10:10 PM UTC:
Hi Joe
I wish to have a chess variant built for phone apps and a website. I came across chessvariants by trying to find contact info for mark lefler and jeff mallett. You seem to well versed in the production of chess games and I am wondering if you could help with contacting these guys or could give me some advice with regards to getting a board version manufactured.

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Apr 25, 2010 04:05 PM UTC:
Is there any way to submit some content without e-mail (before becoming able to use 'post your own game' foem)?

Joe Joyce wrote on Sat, Apr 17, 2010 06:33 PM UTC:
How fast anything is posted depends entirely on when an editor with the necessary skills can get to it. Whether or not it gets posted at all depends on the content. 

As for the first condition, being an editor is voluntary. There aren't many of us still active, and I'm effectively the maintenance staff. Email me at the address you see on my info page [click on my name at left] and I'll see what I can do to help you. 

As for the second condition, content is to be 'G' rated, adequately presented, somehow remotely connected to chess, and if a game design, cannot have been done before. 

That's a brief run-down. You should follow the site links for specific information. Lol, that, or ask my son, is what I do! Joe

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Apr 17, 2010 02:10 PM UTC:
Now it's not important, wich game i send in, i am just sking, how much time may pass before they become published.

Joe Joyce wrote on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 12:16 PM UTC:
What is your name? And what games have you sent in?

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 06:02 AM UTC:
I told you: there is no my name in list!

M Winther wrote on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 04:52 AM UTC:
If you are a registered user you can submit chess variants using that form. Why don't you try.
/Mats

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Apr 15, 2010 10:53 AM UTC:
So how much time i need to wait before games i send are published? If they where not published for a long time, does it becessary means that my games are not suitable?

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Apr 14, 2010 04:26 PM UTC:
M Winther, read this: 'This form allows any person that has previously
submitted material that has been published on these pages, to post their
own pages'.
So, i can't use this yet.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 09:50 AM UTC:
M Winther, there is no my name here (i am registred).

M Winther wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 06:07 AM UTC:
You must publish it yourself, using this form:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/membersubmission.php
/Mats

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 05:58 AM UTC:
I have send a pair of games rules by e-mail. How much time may pass before games become published?

Jack Nitch wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 07:03 PM UTC:
smess problem, trying to move ng7 to g6 and its saying ninny cant do that ?

Joe Joyce wrote on Fri, Dec 4, 2009 03:22 AM UTC:
Hello, Martin. Email me and I'll try to get you set up. Click on my name on the left here, and use that email address. Joe

Martin wrote on Thu, Dec 3, 2009 10:22 PM UTC:
Hi chessvariants team! I tried to submit a chess variant 'Perleberger Bridge Chess' via e-mail to the general contact address one month ago. Without a reply until now I'm afraid my e-mail got lost? Is there another way for newbies to submit content? Thanks in advance. :-)

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Tue, Nov 10, 2009 12:24 PM UTC:
It is still checkmate.

ron forrest wrote on Tue, Nov 10, 2009 09:26 AM UTC:
When an opponent puts you in checkmate but does not realize it and calls check, is it still checkmate or does the fact that he did not call checkmate have some bearing?

David Howe wrote on Sat, Feb 14, 2009 10:12 PM UTC:
Hi Ray, I cannot find you in the database. What is your userid?

ray costello or trir wrote on Sat, Feb 14, 2009 01:55 AM UTC:
please help me to log on as i am playing games with family. I think my pass word is 4716364? my e-mail is [email protected] If my pass word is correct and/or incorrect please e-mail to confirm. Thank you.. ray costello.

Gary Gifford wrote on Fri, Jul 18, 2008 07:49 AM UTC:
If your King is in check you must do one of the following: (a) move your king out of check, (b) block the check (interpose), or (c) capture the checking piece or pawn. b and c do not work in cases of double-check and b will not work against knight checks.

You could not checkmate your opponent while leaving your own king in check.


Anonymous wrote on Thu, Jul 17, 2008 10:04 PM UTC:
I was playing a game of chess yesterday and my king had been put in check, but on my turn all i had to do was move my rook and then my opponents king would be check mated. Is it legal to check mate my opponent while i myself am in check?

SHANNON RENE GARDNER wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:48 PM UTC:
I THINK YOU NEED TO CHECK OUT 3RDMILLENNIUMCHESS, YOU WILL FIND IT TO BE THE COMPLETION OF CHESS. GOOGLE IT AND GET IN TOUCH WITH SHANNON ,

Nevaka wrote on Tue, May 13, 2008 12:05 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
So I was curious; why can a pawn, upon reaching the opposite side of the chess board, not remain a pawn? I personally see no reason why this should not be included in the rules. I might even go so far as to suggest the pawn be allowed to begin his trek back across to where he came from.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Mon, May 12, 2008 11:57 PM UTC:
Hi Admins,

A corrections for the What's New Page:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/whatsnew.php

For the week ending May 14, 2008 there are two Game Courier Presets entries for Modern Random Chess.

The one that says Author Jose Carrillo, Inventor Gabriel Maura, is actually for Modern Chess (not Modern Random Chess). The other one is OK.

A request: for the informational page for MRC64, can you add the text description 'Modern Random Chess 64' next to the link? (just like it was done for the MRC64 Game Courier Preset entry).

Thanks.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sun, May 11, 2008 01:59 PM UTC:
Admins,

Can someone please update the Query page on 'M' items below:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/mainquery.php?type=Any&startswithletter=M&orderby=LinkText&displayauthor=1&displayinventor=1

to include the Modern Random Chess Game Courier preset:
/play/pbm/play.php?game%3DModern+Random+Chess%26settings%3DMRC

Thanks.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 07:32 PM UTC:
Thanks David.

I did my first contributions, the Modern Random Chess variant:

http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MSmodernrandomch

and the new Bishop Adjustment Rule:

http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MSthebishopadjus

David Howe wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 05:51 PM UTC:
Jose, you are now a contributor. Please feel free to publish your variants...

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 12:32 PM UTC:
How does one become a Contributor to Chess Variants?

I have a new Bishop Adjustment Rule that I want to publish (next to Carlos Cetina's BCR rule), and I have 3 news variants that I've created that I also want to publish.

Brian Guo wrote on Sat, Mar 8, 2008 06:19 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Why is there no 'maharaja' in the initial position?

Neo wrote on Wed, Feb 6, 2008 04:38 PM UTC:Average ★★★
Not really so easy for a newb like me, so it defeats the purpose of learning, also, it is confusing as most of the time we can't trace the play the comp made, if we can't SEE the moves, again, how can we learn ? thanks

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Nov 17, 2007 01:25 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Great site but you shoud know that the piece you call Mao is actually Ma. 
Ma is the Chinese word for horse, not Mao which can mean cat, feather or
hair, rivet and thick or dense, depending on the tone.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Sep 17, 2007 10:52 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

We have linked to your nice site.

http://www.chessvariants.com/shogi.html

We hope you may link to our site.

If linked, please send mail to us, how to find it.

==================================================================

ƒRƒ“ƒsƒ…[ƒ^‚ð—˜—p‚µ‚½«Šû‚̐¢ŠE The Shogi World with Computer

ŠÇ—ŽÒ –Lãài‚Æ‚æ‚݂݁j webmaster: Toyomimi

[email protected] http://www.specjp.com

==================================================================


Dr Dave wrote on Mon, Aug 13, 2007 02:28 PM UTC:
Comment posted 2005: any thoughts since?

Dear Hans and colleagues

I was having a game of XiangChi with another member of our club and
dropped by to see what might be new on your site;
I'm so impressed with all the effort you have put in on the content and
quality of this and other games since I was last here.  Keep up the good
work!

I was also vastly impressed with the neat comments system.  Is that
something you've devised yourselves, or a package that you've found
somewhere?  I was just about to sit down with some colleagues here and
try
to implement something similar for our own website at work
(www.sheu.org.uk), but would prefer not to re-invent the wheel if I can
avoid it.  Is the PHP coding something you can point me to, or are
prepared to share?

Thanks very much


Dave Regis

[email protected]

May your pieces harmonise with your Pawn structure and
your sacrifices be sound in all variations

D _
 / '()/~    Dave Regis         &8^D* Exeter Chess Coaching Page etc.:
|| \_/|    = DrDave on FICS   http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/
~\   /                      '...what else exists in the world but
chess?'
 _|||__SHEU                  -- NABOKOV    'Contribute!' -- Doug Attig

ryan wrote on Tue, May 8, 2007 11:40 PM UTC:
i heard that you always have to trap the king in chess.if you put him in check and the opponent does not make the right move, can you just eliminate it with one piece?

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Mar 16, 2007 01:55 PM UTC:
COMMENT METTRE ECHECS ET MAT, ET CES CONSEQUENSE?

QUEYREL wrote on Fri, Dec 22, 2006 10:31 AM UTC:
I would like to introduce you  wth a new chess variant and cannot!
here is the web site where you will find information : www.fortuit.fr
best regards to the whole team
Luc Queyrel : [email protected]

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Fri, Nov 3, 2006 05:43 AM UTC:
you are on the wrong page, you should read here
http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/chess.html

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Nov 1, 2006 08:18 PM UTC:
Can you move a king to the opponents side of the board and redeem a captured piece?

Gary Gifford wrote on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 05:37 PM UTC:
Alison:  No.  The first capture ends the move.  Your question could also be asked of Queens, Bishops, and Rooks
 for non-diagonal (orthogonal) captures)... and even Kings.  In all cases, the single-capture ends the move.

Alison wrote on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 03:56 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

My question is:

Can a pawn capture two pawns if they are in a subsequent diagonal position. For example if there are 2 white pawns in 2 diagonal spaces can they be captured in one move with the black pawn moving 2 diagonal spaces in one go?


Abdul-Rahman Sibahi wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 10:49 PM UTC:
I sent an e-mail to the General Contact address (with a link to a Courier preset I made) and I didn't get a response till now. Hos long does it take to submit material for the first time ?

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 02:08 PM UTC:
It is possible to have nine Queens in Chess. I already knew it was legal, and to find out whether it could actually be done, I just played a game against myself with the object of getting nine Queens for White. I got all nine Queens, checkmating Black only when I got the ninth Queen. Of course, this required lots of cooperation between Black and White, and in a normal game where both players are trying to win, it is very unlikely that either player will ever have nine Queens. But however improbable it will be in actual games, it is possible.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 12:26 PM UTC:
why do u need 9 queens, 4 four queens will cover the whole board. no, u can never have 9 queens.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 11:20 AM UTC:
Only if you are playing regicide rules in 4-Way Chess

Jeremy Good wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 11:04 AM UTC:
Yes, but only if you also get out of check at the same time.

adam cook wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 07:10 AM UTC:Average ★★★
WHEN YOU ARE IN CHECK ARE YOU ALLOWED TO ATTACK

inder wrote on Fri, Jul 21, 2006 06:38 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
can i have nine queen at some perticular time

Vijay Srinivas wrote on Tue, Jul 4, 2006 08:25 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
I dont understand much about the 'Mad Elephant Chess'. The one thing I dont understand is about taunting the mad elephant. Could it be described better?

piyushdadrwala wrote on Wed, May 24, 2006 06:35 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
very creative,about hexagonal chess,i am too creative i made a new chess in
which dinnasour will  play a part, as well as  ,i designe a unique karom.in
this regard pl help me from where we can patent?
piyushdadriwala
[email protected]

SavageCHEZZ wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 10:38 PM UTC:Average ★★★
I wanted to know, when can a person CANCEL a game. I and another individual started a game of CHESS. Well then he said he wanted more time per move, so asked the moderator of the site, her friend to CANCEL the RATED game. He did saying that he did not legaly move 4 moves, so she could CCANCEL.. How many moves untill Cancelation is possible.. I thought it was four moves total??

Gary Gifford wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 01:36 PM UTC:
50 Move Rule - I was reffering to USCF and FIDE rules for standard Chess. There is no 'official' 25-move rule. A player can claim a draw when there is 'insufficient mating material.' When that is the case the game ends at that point, as a draw -- no continued playing for 25 or 50 moves... not even for 1 more move.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 11:34 PM UTC:
yes, but in chess variants the rules are different for every game. Are u talking about USCF Tournament rules? Typically in friendly games people commonly play that if one player only has a king left u must check-mate him in 25 moves or its a draw.

Gary Gifford wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 10:51 PM UTC:
The 50 move rule is a bit more than what was recently stated regarding pawn
movement.  The rule makes the game drawn, if

the last 50 consecutive moves have been made without the movement of any
pawn AND without the capture of any piece (or pawn).

Thus,when a piece is captured (or a pawn) the 50 move count must start all
over again.

M Winther wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 04:40 PM UTC:
There is no such 16 move rule. There is a 50 move rule, however, which says
that a pawn must be moved within 50 moves, otherwise the game is declared a
draw.
--Mats

Avinash wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 02:33 PM UTC:
TO. Whom so ever Concerned I have a doubt as; 1. I have a rooke and Queen but my opponent is having only Queen with some Pawns on Both sides. If it is not possible to finish the game within 16 moves, whether the game is DRAWN or Who is Winner? @. What is 16 move rule? I hope you will help me in this regard & oblige. Thanks & Regards Avinash

unknownwarrior wrote on Thu, May 4, 2006 12:30 AM UTC:
u forgot about pawn passon when your opponent fales to capture yur pawn with his own, you may move your pawn diagonnaly behind his,and capture it as ur next move

Jon P. Wearley wrote on Fri, Feb 17, 2006 04:14 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Hello, I have patented a 4 way chess variant, Quad Kingdom Chess. You can research it at www.quadkingdomchess.com . I would appreciate your response and feedback. Thank you, Jon P. Wearley

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 06:08 PM UTC:
Actually, the Pinyin transliteration of 马 is mǎ, not ma. Although it is not the Pinyin transliteration of the word, the spelling of mao has long been common in fairy chess literature. There are several systems of Chinese transliteration besides Pinyin, and it may have come from one of these.

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 01:41 PM UTC:
lol ... we know ..

Chuck Norris wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 06:36 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
The horse is called 'Ma' not 'Mao'

josh the posh wrote on Sat, Jan 7, 2006 11:19 AM UTC:Poor ★
i want 2 play

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 09:36 PM UTC:
We don't have an email list, per se, and if we did, we would need your
email address before we could put you on it. We do have a Yahoo!
discussion group, which you can sign up for yourself. You will find it at


http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/chessvariants/

If you're interested in participating in the various activities of this
site, such as voting in polls, playing games online, and discussing Chess
variants, you can follow this URL and become a registered user:

http://www.chessvariants.org/onthese/membership.html

Valentino wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 08:21 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
My 'Victoria Principal' and i love spending quiet  evenings martinique
style in (jacuzzi), playing chess.
Great Site!
place me on email list
Adam Clore
7459 buffalo Ave
Niagara falls, New York 14304

Ed Trice wrote on Tue, Dec 6, 2005 09:49 AM UTC:
I am not sure where to put this. My bookmark for the Gothic Chess comment
areas points to dead space. Anyway, here goes:

=============

The 2005 Gothic Chess Computer World Championship will be held online this
year at the http://www.GothicChessLive.com website. Everyone is invited to
watch, and if you have written a Gothic Chess program, participation is
free! We have one candidate from Iran this year, so we can neither charge
an entrance fee nor award any prize money in case this person enters
and/or wins (USA citizens cannot transaction any money with Cuba, Iran,
and a few other countries.) All participants will be mentioned in an
article appearing in the June 2006 issue of the International Computer
Games Association Journal.

The 2004 event was reported on at the Chessville.com website:

http://www.chessville.com/GothicChess/ComputerWorldChampionships.htm

For rules and registration, as well as playing times and login
information, visit:

http://s13.invisionfree.com/Gothic_Chess_Forum/index.php?act=SC&c=5

Come watch the best programs play for the title of the world's best!

Andy wrote on Fri, Dec 2, 2005 12:42 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
There is so much about the rules of chess that it is silly not to find anywhere the topic 'which player playes a white...is a winer always starts another and another game with whites..or oponents switch each time after the game...no mater of outcome of the game ??? I'm saying we switch my boddy wants to keep whites ater each win...help soleve this matter.. Andy

Jared McComb wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 09:32 PM UTC:
The only thing related to 'reclaiming a queen' in Chess is the promotion
of a pawn to a queen.  For this to happen, the pawn must reach the final
row of the board, from its owner's perspective - in other words, get your
pawn all the way to the other side of the board, and you can promote it to
a queen.

(Additionally, the term 'reclaiming' is a bit inaccurate here, because
it is possible to get more than one queen by doing this multiple times.)

jackiemawr wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 06:32 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
My husband and son love playing chess, but at the moment are having a debate about 'reclaiming a queen' is it a legal move, where does she start from, after reclaiming, all rules to do with the above. Please help.

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2005 05:47 AM UTC:
yes, it is a chess variant, called many names .. Also know as: Suicide
Chess, Losing Chess, Killer Chess, Take-all Chess, Giveaway Chess, Must
Capture Chess .. see here -->
http://www.chessvariants.org/diffobjective.dir/giveaway.html

Nova wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2005 04:29 AM UTC:
Yeah I have a question.
My sister came home, she has joined the Chess 'Team' at her school
recently, and she told us of this version of Chess she calls 'TAke It'
where the object of the game is to make your oppenent take all of your
peices off the board.
She was rather vague in the rules and its making me a little nuts. I was
wondering if a. you have heard of such a version, b. what it is called?
and c. if perhaps you knew more what the rules where?

Thanks!:D

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2005 03:41 AM UTC:
how do i make the pieces move with my computer

Peter Aronson wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 08:48 PM UTC:
John, try Tezhi Luzhanqi, also known as Chinese Army Chess.

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 06:27 PM UTC:
Quote:
I have recently bought a game of Chinese Army Chess from the internet. It consists of 50 tiles 25 which are red and an equal number of black tiles. I have have a copy of the rules, but I have no clue what the Chinese symbols mean on the pieces. Do you know where I can get pictures of the pieces with identity explanation of the Chinese symbols so that I can figure out what the pieces are and be able to play a game? Thanks for your help. John

It can be found on http://chessvariants.org/xiangqi.html

John wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 06:11 PM UTC:
I have recently bought a game of Chinese Army Chess from the internet. It consists of 50 tiles 25 which are red and an equal number of black tiles. I have have a copy of the rules, but I have no clue what the Chinese symbols mean on the pieces. Do you know where I can get pictures of the pieces with identity explanation of the Chinese symbols so that I can figure out what the pieces are and be able to play a game? Thanks for your help. John

Cliff Lundberg wrote on Thu, Oct 6, 2005 09:40 AM UTC:Poor ★
I'm mentioned under cylindrical chess. I'd like to update my e-mail address to: [email protected] Thanks! Cliff

metalmaker01 wrote on Thu, Jul 14, 2005 03:46 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
umm can a king take a pawn that has it in check if a castle is nearby so that my plan is worked out correctly or does the castle have to take it

David Howe wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 05:17 PM UTC:
X., please try again. I made a slight typo in the code.

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 03:39 PM UTC:
When trying to update the index information of member-submitted pages, I get this error message: <b>Error performing query: Table 'chessvar_Test.WhatsNew' doesn't exist</b>

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Sun, May 29, 2005 07:53 AM UTC:
The Chess Variant Pages e-mail address has been changed, at least for now. I won't quote it here to avoid web trolling robots, but you can see it at this page. If you submitted something recently using the old editors' address, please re-send it. We may not have received it. Thanks!

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Thu, May 19, 2005 03:52 AM UTC:
I can't post chess variant uses the page to automatically enter chess variants into the system.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Apr 3, 2005 01:09 AM UTC:
My attempts to get this page to work properly with Netscape 4 have been unsuccessful. One reason for this was that Netscape 4 uses document.layers and document.layer instead of document.getElementById. But another reason was that I couldn't get Netscape 4 to set the values of elements, even using its peculiar DOM. So what I did was to program this page to mimic the effect of JavaScript being completely off when document.getElementById is not available in a browser's DOM. So Netscape 4 users will just get the full content with links that go to the appropriate sections. That being said, Netscape 4 is really an obsolete browser, and anyone who still uses it should be able to upgrade to something better.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sat, Apr 2, 2005 02:54 AM UTC:
I have just tested this page on web browsers I have on my Windows 95 computer, which I usually no longer use. It worked perfectly for Netscape 6.2, Internet Explorer, and Lynx. Lynx does not support JavaScript or CSS, but this page did degrade gracefully on Lynx. The only browser that did not work well was Netscape Communicator. Some of the JavaScript worked, and some didn't. Fortunately, part of what didn't work was the ability to hide parts of the page. So at least someone using this browser could view the entire content of the page. But links did not work, the CSS worked incompletely, and, as mentioned, text could not be hidden. I saw one error I know how to fix. I need to place a JavaScript comment before I end the HTML comment that encloses the JavaScript. But I can't fix anything until I get back to my other computer, since my ftp program on this one doesn't have the right information for logging onto chessvariants.org. As for Netscape Communicator, I think the main problem is that it uses a different DOM than Gecko. So, with information on the old Netscape DOM, I might be able to fix it by providing alternate code for Netscape Communicator. But it might not be worth the trouble. Even the Netscape homepage wasn't working well with this program, and I doubt it is still in much use, given that Windows 95 users can upgrade to Netscape 6.

100 comments displayed

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.