The site has moved to a new server, and there are now some issues to fix. Please report anything needing fixing with a comment to the homepage.



The Chess Variant Pages




[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
Chess JesterBROKEN LINK!. 4-player variant with two new pieces.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
J Andrew Lipscomb wrote on 2004-07-03 UTCPoor ★
I can't comment particularly on the quality of the game (not having played it), but ya gotta wonder about inventors who think a Camel (which its Jester is) is the equal of a Rook...

Matthew Scholle wrote on 2004-07-13 UTC
Regarding the comment from J Andrew Lipscomb.

We have looked very closely at all aspects of our game.  Including the
value of this piece.  We based the value not only on the power, but the
fact that only one Jester(Camel) per army is present.  Having only one
Jester makes the piece somewhat sneaky, you have to keep you eye on it. 
Also, The queen and prince are the only other pieces that are singled out.
 All other chessmen have a copart Rooks Bishops Knights.  And these pieces
are rated between 3 and 5.    

Although I do see Andrews point.  I have also argued this.

geroin9l wrote on 2006-06-21 UTCGood ★★★★

snymrik wrote on 2006-07-02 UTCExcellent ★★★★★

kipetok wrote on 2006-07-10 UTCExcellent ★★★★★

cirkyl wrote on 2006-09-05 UTCGood ★★★★

ssbornik wrote on 2006-09-06 UTCExcellent ★★★★★

nikelir wrote on 2006-09-12 UTCExcellent ★★★★★

8 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.