H. G. Muller wrote on Thu, Apr 5, 2018 08:00 AM UTC:
Well, I would say that editors who claim a game is great for playing while almost no one on this site wants to play it, are just plain wrong, rather than 'more knowledgeable'. It seems to me that a distinction 'only CVP editors like this' is not useful to anyone except the editors, and isn't really worth publishing.
To provide any added value for the general reader, the criteria according to which the variants in the list have been judged must officially be different.
Well, I would say that editors who claim a game is great for playing while almost no one on this site wants to play it, are just plain wrong, rather than 'more knowledgeable'. It seems to me that a distinction 'only CVP editors like this' is not useful to anyone except the editors, and isn't really worth publishing.
To provide any added value for the general reader, the criteria according to which the variants in the list have been judged must officially be different.