Single Comment

Braves' Chess. Solves the problem of draws in chess. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]

Rich Hutnik wrote on Tue, Apr 15, 2008 11:06 PM UTC:

Ok, looks like we are building up a list of issues chess faces. Let's review thus far:
1. Stale openings
2. Drawishness
3. Computers outthinking humans.

How about we also look at other issues relating to this? Like some of these isses:
4. Chess is boring people who don't know it and not getting their interest. It is facing a growth problem, and it doesn't captivate non-chess players. Pretty much the world outside the chess world knows what chess is but doesn't care about it. It faces an issue with getting youths interested, with it using 'education' as a supposed hook to get tax dollars spent on it. Yes, it is pitched as some form of getting smarter, that you want to get your kids into. It isn't a fun thing in its own right, but is something that is supposed to fix schools and improve science scores. Yes, chess has gotten into the 'infotainment' business, because it isn't captivating based on its own merits (had it been done right, it could do that).
5. You can also add to the mix here that chess ends up being people playing the game, rather than playing the player. Well, if they are playing the player, people don't see this. People see chess as something they want to master, rather than a battlefield where they can demonstrate they master their opponent. Games like poker, which get on TV have player vs player to them. Chess is more like player vs board. Only when it was Fischer vs the Russian Chess Machine (Bobby as defender of the free world), did people care outside of chess, and chess popularity exploded, bring a flock of new players to the game. When something gets like this, it generates new players (for example, number of poker players has doubled since the pocket cam entered into poker programming in North America).
6. Can you also add to the mix that no one has figured out how to make chess sustainable on TV either?
7. Political infighting.

Can we sum up by just saying that chess in its current state is stale? That is an issue that encompasses a lot, and leads to a lot of political infighting. And those who say, eventhough people still do footraces while there are cars and trains, physical or not, if no one outside of those involved cares or is interested, then what? Sure, a computer can solve Sudoku puzzles faster than a human. Humans still can play it. People like Sudoku, so the whole computer beats humans isn't that important of an issue.

It is a state of staleness that produces 60% draws on the highest level and squabbling over a few percentages getting it down (aka, thinking Sofia's rule is the answer, and thinking that your scoring system that rewards players drawing will suddenly cause players not to game it and draw less). It is shooting down just about every idea, and resting on your laurels thinking the next Bobby Fischer will show up to save the day. It is also saying, 'What is wrong with 60% draws? So long as it isn't early offering of draws and they are 'fought out' that is ok'.' In other words, things are the way they are, handed down by the divine, so let's not question it at all. If such is a reason for things being stale, who is each person to question it?

It is thinking in the area of intellectual competition, you have no other peers (nevermind that Go and other games will be making inroads, and kids play real-time strategy games). It is then whining you don't get the respect you deserve, because you think your being around so long means you will remain forever. And it is being upset at 'mindless' poker getting the attention and money instead of chess.

I would say the issues of chess are just a TAD larger than whether or not there is a draw issue, or the opening book is stale. The variant community could actually help to fix a lot of these issues, if it was allowed into the conversation, and if it believed it could actually help to fix things. The variant community, working towards this end could help to revive chess, in multiple forms, making things exciting again. But, if things are going to be just a bunch of artists on separate islands passing notes in a bottle, then we may not see much going on. Not to say that this is the case, but it is easy to end up keeping to oneself, and one's own ideas. I know this from personal experience.

Just my two cents. And if you think it is worth less than that, well that is your choice :-)