Anonymous wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 01:21 AM UTC:
>It's not completely reliable, of course, and I didn't say
that ND is a poor game...
You did, in fact, say that ND was a poor game with your rating of
'Poor'. It is one thing to rate a page poor when one has not played the
game described within if the instructions are unclear. But that is not
true in this case.
I do not claim that ND is a perfect game. But neither is any other chess
variant here, and thus if rating games in relation to other games here
seems illogical.
I am sorry if this comment or the previous one seemed hostile. But I
cannot help the fact that I am not a member.