[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Single Comment Stanley Random Chess . Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Daniel Roth wrote on 2005-09-27 UTCPoor ★I looked at the mao game and I think that one will be easier to catch than SRC. Just curious how will the cheating be prevented in such games. I consider that SRC can not be learned by playing at all. Else it needs some consistency which does not exist in SRC. For example white moves 1st d2-d4 does not work every time. How will a SRC grand master see that in advance? And playing of someone who knows all rules against someone who does not is quite unfair. At least someone who knows the rules should says this in advance of a game of SRC. Then the player not knowing the rules can at least try to learn them. And another thing is the complete lack of example SRC games. Another thing is how the client works at www.schemingmind.com. If a player makes a move, which is illegal in the case of the SRC rule set, it makes a random move from all available legal moves. Two players playing SRC who don't know the rules is very funny. The other game (MC) is just a nonsense. How can someone keep a '125 volume' ruleset in the mind? And what is the playing material for that game?