The Chess Variant Pages
Custom Search




[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments by João Neto

Later Reverse Order Earlier
This item is a reference work
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2000-02-08
 Author: João Pedro Neto. Mutators. Article discussing the concept of Mutators.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2008-05-26 UTC
Hi Richard.

Thanks for that taxonomic work. The harder part is too make those concepts glue together. How to translate those ideas into types and how to compose those types into a game.

joaopedroneto wrote on 2008-05-26 UTC
Hi Ji!

I'm not sure if we would like to see the board as a separate entity from
the game pieces. It must be thought over. A board can be seen as a set or
lattice of special pieces, that for most games are idle, neutral and
non-interactive, but in some games they interact. Some games allow players
to move cell boards, or cells can be removed (like in Zertz), or cells act
over pieces (like games with different terrains)...

João Neto wrote on 2008-05-23 UTC
A mutator language must be typed. Not all mutators go with each other. Some mutators deal with turns (like progressive mutators), others deal with pieces (eg, apply [Real] to chess king], and so on... This should ease the job of the programmer as well as the language designer.

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2000-03-26
 By João Pedro Neto. The Central Squares. 3d chess variant where all three levels share their central squares. (6x6x3, Cells: 100) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
joaopedroneto wrote on 2006-05-05 UTC
Joe, you are right about saying that the central sqs are simultaneous on all 3 levels. That's why the knight cannot move up and down on those central sqs. The only moves that the knight can do inside that area is move orthogonally then right/left/up or down: these are the combinations that provide the move range on the diagram.

joaopedroneto wrote on 2006-05-04 UTC
To understand the knight move, you must think 3D. The L move of a chess knight can be (a) just orthogonal (eg, vertical then horizontal), (b) orthogonal then up/down, (c) up/down then orthogonal. That's why the knight has a lot more moves than expected.

The same happens with the Bishop (they can move diagonally up/down) or the Rook (they can move up/down besides orthogonally)


joaopedroneto wrote on 2006-05-03 UTC
The basic idea is that those 3x3 central squares are shared by all board
levels, so a piece inside one of those squares can move as if it was in
any of those 3 boards. Eg, a Rook in d3 can move as it was in board A,
board B or board C. 

That's why the move capabilities inside the central squares provide much
more power to any piece there.

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2001-03-01
 By João Pedro Neto. Connect Chess. Players win by forming a link between the first and last ranks of the board. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2006-01-18 UTC
[I just saw this question now] Indeed that situation was not specified by the original rules. I would say: (a) if a player forms a friendly link and also an enemy link, he wins; (b) if he forms just an enemy link, he loses.

This item is a news item
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2006-01-01
 Author: Mike  Adams. David Pritchard. Death notice.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2006-01-03 UTC
David Pritchard's death is a loss (every death is) but his work on chess
variants is very much alive and, hopefully, will continue to be fruitful
for a long time.

I feel that chessvariants.org and its community of users (the only ones
that give some meaning to this collection of information) is a remarkable
tribute to his previous, pre-internet work, 'the Encyclopedia of Chess
Variants'. May our interest be a persistent thank you.

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 1998-02-03
 By João Pedro Neto. Swap Chess. A move can consist of a series of pieces swapping places. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2006-01-03 UTC
>did you consider the basic one-step swap which I described in Switching
>Chess? 

To be honest, I don't remember :-) But I guess not, usually I tend to
create faster games that FIDE chess, and by allowing just one move per
turn (which might be a swap) my intuition tells me that it would be harder
to mate a swapping king (of course, I may be wrong). Anyway, I don't
recall ever tried the rules of Switching Chess on my chess ruminations.

>I described Switching Chess before I knew of Swap Chess or Balanced Swap

>Chess, however, I later found an applet by Ed Friedlander called Swap
>Chess 1 that is almost identical to Switching Chess and predated it, 
>yet it is not attributed to you. 

I suppose Ed Friedlander read about swap chess here at chessvariants.org.
He has applets of other games of mine (like magnetic or capture-the-flag
chess). I think that applet implements Balanced Swap Chess.

>I guess I am not sure about the originality of Switching Chess vis-a-vis
>Swap Chess.

This seems a case of convergent invention. The idea is too simple and will
probably be 'found' many other times. Eventually, it was already invented
before 1998.

Cheers,

João Neto wrote on 2006-01-03 UTC
Your rule seems appropriate. These original rules create too much havoc on
the position, and make medium-term strategies difficult to plan. 

At that time, I start playing a better variant of the same idea: Balanced
Swap Chess (http://www.chessvariants.org/diffmove.dir/balancedswap.html).
In this variant, the moving ability is much more constrained: only one
swap per move. 

Thanks for your comments! If you like to try a game of balanced swap
chess, email me.

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2003-05-27
 By João Pedro Neto. Abstract ChessThis item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2003-05-27
 By João Pedro Neto.. Pieces are represented by stacks of different heights.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-07-22 UTC
Well, 14 knights is indeed a powerful army, but takes time to make it.
The other player may develop is own pieces in comfortable positions. But
that's the spirit of abchess, see the position and reshape your own army
accordingly.

João Neto wrote on 2004-07-21 UTC
That's a good idea. But it probably would mean that both players would try
to keep their queens near an adjacent piece, so they can create a new King
while demoting the previous King (if attacked) to a queen and escape the
attack. And this tactic could continue in a cycle.

Usually, I don't like this type of thing (ie, multiple Kings, demoting
royal pieces, ...).

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2004-07-22
 By Tony  Quintanilla. Switching Chess. In addition to normal moves, switch with an adjacent friendly piece. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-07-20 UTC
Even with Greg's extra rule, I think the game will create many passive
positions. You could restrict the switch option to non-royal pieces, so
the King could not switch (and so, couldn't easily escape eventual
attacks).

Also, check Swap Chess (www.chessvariants.com/diffmove.dir/swap.html) as a
similar CV concept.

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2004-06-08
 By Alex  Wood. Towers Chess. Win by pushing towers to the Kings' squares. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-06-25 UTC
I didn't understand the winning condition. How the game ends?

If the goal is stated in a sufficient abstract way, this may be a general
mutator for games with movement.

This item is a story, poem or other fictional work
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2001-11-23
 Author: João Pedro Neto. The Hitchhiker's Guide to Chess - Part II. Several chess variants in the context of a Socratic dialog.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-06-17 UTC
Not yet... Only the future may tell you for sure :-)

This item is a Zillions-of-Games file
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2004-05-15
 Author: Antoine  Fourrière. Inventor: João Pedro Neto. Slide Chess ZIP file. Variant on 44 squares with moving cages.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-06-15 UTC
The 1st point (check using a cage insertion) is correct.

However, the 2nd point may happen. A pawn inside a cage can be promoted by
an insertion. Check the comments in the game webpage.

Once again, thanks for your work on the ZRF :-)

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2004-04-21
 By João Pedro Neto. Slide-Chess. Variant on 44 squares with moving cages. (7x8, Cells: 44) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-06-09 UTC
yes, that's right. 

Inside the cages they are in a non-zone regarding promotions, as the
typical place inside most companies :-)

João Neto wrote on 2004-06-09 UTC
the pawn can be inside a cage, eg:

8    [O] ( )        
7   . n b k b n r   
6   . p p p p p p              
5   . . . . . . .
4   . . . . . . .
3   . O O O O O O
2   R N B K B N R
1           
  a b c d e f g h i

now, if that cage is inserted into the board, the pawn will be at the last
row and will be promoted. Since the cage may belong to the adversary, it is
the mover that decides the promotion, not the owner

João Neto wrote on 2004-06-04 UTC
Hi, indeed Roberto got it right in his ZRF. 

The idea is that the remaining sliding square should not be at the
opposite edge (so, it will not go out of bounds). Both sliding squares
must be diagonally or orthogonally adjacent to the main 6x7 board. 

The last pushed square on the 6x7 board can have pieces, except a King.

Sorry about the wording, natural language can be though :-)

Joao Neto

This item is a Zillions-of-Games file
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2004-05-15
 Author: Antoine  Fourrière. Inventor: João Pedro Neto. Slide Chess ZIP file. Variant on 44 squares with moving cages.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2004-05-16 UTC
Hi Antoine

I wish to thank you to implement Slide Chess.

One problem: Each cage begins on the last player row, you must switch
cages in the setup (this is to avoid direct attacks to the enemy tower)

This item is a game information page
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2000-03-26
 By João Pedro Neto. The Central Squares. 3d chess variant where all three levels share their central squares. (6x6x3, Cells: 100) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
João Neto wrote on 2003-03-20 UTC
I made that game a long time ago (2-3 years) but I think that you could have a Queen just if you promote a pawn. In the setup, the Queen is too powerful on such small board.

21 comments displayed

Later Reverse Order Earlier

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.