Comments by Daslov
I was familiar with Paulowich's Victorian chess of course, but I have never seen an article with the setup that I proposed here. In any case, I was modest enough not to call this variation by my humble name or to attach my name to this variant. After all, this is Capablanca's chess, or rather Carrera's, not mine. I just offered this setup to the owner of Pychess.org, and he really liked it, so it can now be played there and it's the only thing that I really wanted. I only guess that Paulowich didn't believe in this setup enough if he didn't bother to write a single article about it. So, writing this article is my humble contribution, that's all. Btw, it is really unfair that all these variants on 80 squares with traditional pieces plus Archbishops and Chancellors don't bear Carrera's name because he is a real father of this chess. Inventing setups is much easier, right?
Fischer-Benko Chess. Three pieces are placed randomly, the other five by the players.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]I think I deleted it. What about other two pages? Could you check them now and publish them? I think I removed all the typos now.
Who would be so kind to check my article and publish it? I worked hard to remove typos. It should be ok now.
Who can help me to publish this one please? I think I removed all the typos. Thank you in advance.
Ok, thanks for your help. Yes, Benko-Fischer Chess is more important one for me. And you can clarify that you are the co-author of Half-Random Transcendental Chess.
7 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
It could have been called just 'Conservative Chess' but I wanted to make clear about the family to which it belongs. I could have also called it 'Conservative Carrera Chess' but for some people, it wouldn't be clear enough. Doesn't really matter. What I like is that people already play it. Yesterday someone created a game of CCC at Pychess.org and I accepted it and somehow even won.