Check out Symmetric Chess, our featured variant for March, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
V. Reinhart wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2017 04:28 PM UTC:
Thanks for the information. The good news is that a guard (man) doesn't have the same value as any other classical chess piece. It fills a "hole" between knight and bishop, and the rook. So it's usually easy to decide if you should exchange it or not. Capturing a rook is worth the loss of a guard. If in melee with a knight or bishop, get support or flee.
 
Btw, I think that this discussion about the value of the guard provides an irrefutable basis for the inconsistency in naming this piece "Man". In an actual medieval war (not chess), a man is not superior to a knight or bishop. A man is the same thing as a peasant (pawn) and may or may not be well-fed and capable of fighting.
 
A guard is always fit and has martial arts training, and can be armed with weapons such as a dagger or spear, so has good chance when fighting with a knight. (In Waterloo chess the icon for the guard carries a very large stone for throwing, although in this game the guard is even stronger than a king - its inventor has also called him an "Elite" or "Elite Guard").
 
There is also a basis for judging a guard as superior to a bishop. A guard does not have theological training, but the sobering truth is this: the bishop's membership in the clergy will not protect him from an armed fighter trained in the martial arts.
 
Even 14 years ago there were comments that the name "man" might have problems.  (See comments below from 2003).
 
In my opinion this page should be re-titled "Guard", with a comment saying also known as "man".

Edit Form

Comment on the page Man

Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.