Check out Alice Chess, our featured variant for June, 2024.

Michael Nelson wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 09:51 PM UTC:
```I've found that the BN is about halfway between the R and Q in value, 6.5
pawns for Spielmann values. (I agree with Ralph Betza that Spielmann
values are more correct than the beginner's 1-3-5-9 scale.)

Ralph methods rate it at 4 atoms = 6.5 pawns.  Note the following:

1 atom piece  (Wazir)   = 1.5  pawns
2 atom piece  (Knight)  = 3.0  pawns
3 atom piece  (Rook)    = 4.5  pawns
4 atom piece  (BN)      = 6.5  pawns*
5 atom piece  (Queen)   = 8.5  pawns
6 atom piece  (RNN)     =10.5  pawns*
7 atom piece  (Amazon)  =12.5  pawns*

* Hypothetical Spielmann values

Pieces of Rook-strenght or less obey the equivalence 1 atom = 1.5 pawns,
but stronger pieces seem to gain additional value.  I assume this is
because the strong pieces normally mask the weakesses of their components.
So rather than giving the BN a bonus for not being colorbound, a
colorbound 4-atom piece (Bishop-Camel for example) should be penalized.

Also note the each simple piece had one major weakness:

Knight:  Short range
Bishop:  Colorbound
Rook:    only 1/4 of its moves are forward

So BN, RN and Queen all mask two major weakness.```

Edit Form

Comment on the page Legler's Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

# Top level header: `<H1>`

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same `<U>HTML code</U>` enclosed by backticks.

## Secondary Header: `<H2>`

• Unordered list item
• Second unordered list item
• New unordered list
• Nested list item
• An URL by itself:

### Third Level header `<H3>`

1. An ordered list item.
2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
3. A third ordered list item.
``````Here is some preformatted text.
This line begins with some indentation.
This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.``````

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags `<DL>`, `<DT>` and `<DD>`.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.
﻿