Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Antoine Fourrière wrote on Sun, Jul 9, 2006 03:34 AM UTC:
I would prefer more than three players for the Chess-Xiangqi-Shogi phase.
 
How about a Shogi event starting in January, then a Chess event starting
in March, then a Xiangqi event starting in May (because Shogi tends to
take more time than Chess, which tends to take more time than Xiangqi)?.
Each event would have the players moving twice as White and twice as
Black.  If say three players tie for first, the BS/SB method ranks them
for tie-breaks, with player 2 moving first against player 3, and the
winner moving second against player 1, so that there are seldom more than
six games for an individual event (and only four if you don't tie for
first).

Then you give 1 point to the winner, 0.5 point to the runner up, 0.333 to
the third ranked player, and so on... in each game, and you qualify the
seven better players for the second round (thus, the winners for a single
event always get qualified). These seven players move each once as White
and once as Black at each game, with a higher BS/SB ranking in a tie-break
situation giving the higher-ranked player the right either to move first
(and the lower-ranked player choosing at which game) or to choose between
Chess, Xiangqi or Shogi (and the lower-ranked player moving first).

Edit Form

Comment on the page Chess/Xianqi/Shogi Tournament #1

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.