The Chess Variant Pages Menu
Array ( [0] => shogi [1] => xiangqi [2] => play [3] => hexchessglinski [4] => chessbooks [5] => google [6] => google0 [7] => google1 [8] => google2 [9] => 0 [10] => 1 [11] => 2 [12] => 3 [13] => 4 [14] => 5 [15] => 6 [16] => 7 [17] => 8 [18] => 9 [19] => 10 [20] => 11 [21] => 12 [22] => 13 [23] => 14 [24] => 15 [25] => 16 [26] => 17 [27] => 18 [28] => 19 [29] => 20 [30] => 21 [31] => 22 [32] => 23 [33] => 24 [34] => 25 [35] => 26 [36] => 27 [37] => 28 [38] => 29 [39] => 30 [40] => 31 [41] => 32 [42] => 33 [43] => 34 [44] => 35 [45] => 36 [46] => 37 [47] => 38 [48] => 39 [49] => 40 [50] => 41 [51] => 42 [52] => 43 [53] => 44 [54] => 45 [55] => 46 [56] => 47 [57] => 48 [58] => 49 [59] => 50 [60] => 51 [61] => 52 [62] => play0 [63] => play1 [64] => play2 [65] => play3 [66] => play4 )

  • Play
  • Game Courier
  • Games to Play
  • Game Logs
  • Invitations to Play

  • Computer Programs
  • Zillions of Games
  • ChessV
  • Java Applets
  • Games
  • Our Favorites
  • Game Courier's Top 50
  • Recognized Variants

  • ▸ FIDE Chess
  • The Rules of Chess
  • Chess pages
  • Historic
  • ▸ Oriental
  • Xiang Qi (China)
  • Xiang Qi variants
  • Shogi (Japan)
  • Shogi variants
  • All Oriental variants
  • ▸ With a Chess Set
  • Different Moving Pieces
  • Moving Opponent's Pieces
  • Multi-Move Variants
  • Rules About the Board
  • Winning in a Different Way
  • Different Opening Setups
  • Capturing in a Different Way
  • Other Variants
  • Modest Variants
  • Small
  • Large
  • Multi-Player
  • Unequal Armies
  • ▸ Boards of Unusual Shapes
  • Three-Dimensional
  • Hexagonal
  • Round Boards
  • Other
  • Themed Variants
  • ▸ Other Variants
  • Wargames
  • Chess with Cards
  • Chess with Dice
  • Crossovers
  • Incomplete Information
  • Miscellaneous Other
  • Commercial Games
  • Random game page

  • Alphabetical Index
  • Advanced Search
  • More
  • Topic Index
  • Crafts
  • Piececlopedia
  • Piece Articles
  • Publications
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Comments
  • Feedback Form
  • How You Can Help
  • Post Your Own Game
  • Contributors
  • Sign Up/Log In
  • Related
  • ▸ Categories
  • 2d
  • Historical
  • Shop
  • The House of Staunton

  • Amazon.com
  • Today's Deals
  • CVP Gift Shop
  • Chess Variant Books
  • Chess Variant Sets
  • Chess Books
  • Chess Sets
  • Chess Software
  • Shogi Books
  • Shogi Sets
  • Xiangqi Books
  • Xiangqi Sets
  • Strategy Board Games

  • Amazon.ca
  • Deals Store
  • CVP Gift Shop
  • Web
  • Chess Variants Wiki
  • Chessvariants Subreddit
  • External Links


  • Piececlopedia: Alfil

    Historical notes

    The Alfil is the predecessor of the modern Bishop. This piece very probably came from India, where its original name was one of the Sanskrit words for elephant: hasty or gaja. It was alternately known by both names. It is found in the earliest known forms of Chess, such as Chaturanga and Shatranj, and it is very probably one of the original Chess pieces. But there is a bit of uncertainty and even disagreement on this matter.

    The uncertainty is not over the piece's name. An elephant was, as far as anyone knows, one of the original pieces. The uncertainty is over how it moved. In both Shatranj and Chaturanga, it made a two-space diagonal leap, but Chaturanga was an Indian Contempory of Shatranj, and it is Shatranj, the Muslim form of Chess, that we actually have the earliest documentation for. As Murray reports in his History of Chess, there were two other moves for this piece that were current in India. One was the Dabbabah move, and the other was the Silver General move. While the former died out, the latter was the move for this piece in the form of Chess that spread to Burma and Siam. This is the move for the piece in both Burmese Chess and Thai Chess.

    According to Henry Davidson, the five-fold Silver General move was the original move for this piece. Davidson comments on how this move resembles the four legs and trunk of an elephant. But according to H. J. R. Murray, writing in his History of Chess, the two-space diagonal leap was the original move. Murray reasons that the Elephant was the weakest piece in the game, and people began experimenting with ways to make it stronger, whereas they didn't experiment with improving the other pieces. This makes sense, because the Alfil is weaker than the Dabbabah and the Silver General. It can reach only one eighth of all spaces on the chessboard, whereas the Dabbabah can reach one quarter, and the Silver General can reach them all. Besides that, this same kind of experimentation gave birth to modern Chess during the renaissance, when the Alfil and the Ferz, which was the second weakest piece in the game, were replaced by the Bishop and Queen, while the other pieces were left alone. So it seems entirely reasonable that Murray is right.

    When the Persians got Chess from the Indians, they translated the Sanskrit name to pil. Curiously, Golombek points out that pil is not a Persian word. Elephants were not native to Persia, and the Persians borrowed the word from some other language. Golombek also points out that the English word elephant was also borrowed from another language. Although I can't document the connection, elephant does sound similar to alfil. Perhaps it has its roots in the name for a Chess piece.

    As Murray reports in his Short History of Chess, the game hardly changed when the Muslims got it from the Persians. So the Persian pil lept two spaces diagonally. Murray reports in the same book that the Muslims merely modified the name of the piece to suit their own pronunciation, changing the p to an f for the word fil, which became the piece's Arab name. This got prefixed with the Arabic definite article, al, to form the name Alfil.

    When the names of fil and alfil reached Europe, they sometimes changed even more, but the transformed names eventually became associated with the Bishop. Although the name of Alfil is still used for the Bishop in some languages, such as Spanish, English-speakers began the tradition of reserving the name Alfil for the original piece.

    The Alfil has been used in such modern variants as Scirocco and Typhoon by Adrian King, and Al-Ces by Köksal Karakus.

    Movement

    The Alfil makes a (2,2)-jump: it moves two squares diagonally. It `jumps', i.e., it can move regardless whether there is a piece on the intervening square.

    Alfils take in the same way as they move without taking.

    Movement diagram


    !!

    warrior

    !!

    Comments

    Alfils can only reach a very small part of the board. On the standard 8x8 board, an Alfil can reach only one eighth of all the spaces. It covers only half of the same color spaces on half the rows, i.e. two spaces on every other row. In this respect, it is even more colorbound than the Bishop, which can reach half the squares on a standard Chess board.

    Vocabulary: Leaper

    The Alfil is a leaper. A leaper is able to move directly to another space on the board without passing through other spaces. If other pieces stand between a leaper and its destination, it just leaps over them as though they weren't in the way. Other leapers include the Knight, the Dabbabah, and the Camel.

    Alternate Images

    Click on an image to view the full piece set it belongs to.

    Abstract Set Alfaerie Set Cazaux Set

    In Chess problems, the Alfil is often represented by the letter A or by a Bishop symbol.

    References

    Davidson, Henry A. A Short History of Chess, 1949.

    Golombek,Harry. Chess: A History, 1976.

    Murray, H. J. R. A History of Chess, 1913.

    Murray, H. J. R. A Short History of Chess, 1963.


    This is an item in the Piececlopedia: an overview of different (fairy) chess pieces.
    Written by Fergus Duniho Hans Bodlaender.
    WWW page created: September 4, 1998. Last modified: December 17, 2001.
    

    Comments

    This item is a piececlopedia entry,
It belongs to categories: Orthodox chess, 
It was last modified on: 2001-12-17
 Author: Fergus  Duniho. Alfil. Jumps two diagonally.
    2008-10-16 Nuno UnverifiedNone

    But I'm confused.. What is the name for Elephant in Arabic? since the piece represented just that! 'Al' is the article ok.. ist it Fil? Or did the name just made sense in Persian (Pil?)and the Arabs did the same thing Spanish did in keeping the name without any mining? (well.. in reality Alfil IS the Spanish word for Bishop, so it has a mining). Any native Arabic please want's to comment?

    Curious.. if my country (Portugal) and Spain have a lot in common on it's evolution, why do We call also Bishop to the bishop? :P

    View
    2004-09-23 Charles Gilman UnverifiedNoneThe anonymous Excellent in the previous comment reminded me why I haven't given this page a rating of Excellent myself. It still carries the errorneous etymological speculation on which I commented earlier. The word elephant derives from the Classical Greek elephas, dating to at least a millennium before early Chess began spreading west. There is plenty of documentation of that. View
    2004-06-05 Excellent View
    2003-07-09 Charles Gilman UnverifiedNoneTrue, but I was adding to John Lawson's comment. In many of the games that have used this piece the achievement of the combination of pieces would win regardless of position because of Bare King. View
    2003-07-07 NoneNot only could the four-Alfil checkmate never happen in a traditional game, nor could the King-and-two-Alfils checkmate, as an Alfil could not reach c3 or any other square threatening a corner.

    This makes an assumption about the starting squares of the alfils which is unwarranted. As far as I can tell, the question was not asked with respect to shatranj or any other particular game.

    View
    Number of ratings: 6, Average rating: Good, Number of comments: 16

    List all comments and ratings for this item.

    Add a comment or rating for this item.

    Credits

    Author: Fergus Duniho.

    Advertising Privacy

    http://www.chessvariants.com/piececlopedia.dir/alfil.html
    Last Modified: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:51:00 -0400
    [info] [links] [edit] [quick edit]

    Last modified: Sunday, April 1, 2012