Check out Symmetric Chess, our featured variant for March, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Ambiguous Chess. A modest variant, similar to Refusal Chess. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Fabrice Liardet wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 08:00 AM UTC:
Yes, it is perfectly playable with the rule that you can't put your opponent into check. I prefer it with the original rule because of the mating combinations it provides, but that is just a matter of taste. As for stalemate=win, fine with me of course. The two-piece rule sounds more artificial, it could be an idea if it becomes clear that endgames are too difficult to win. <p>Some time ago, somebody pointed out to me that a pawn should be promoted by the owner's opponent, which makes sense. I would like to add this to the standard rules.