-->
| More Information on this item |
Rate this page! | Skip to comments
Today we turn to nature for a gentle inspiration about how to be in two places at once when you're not anywhere at all, and then descend into the Dungeons of Doom to expand the idea by cutting it in half.
First it stretches its face to touch a new place, then brings up its rear until both are near.
It does not buzz, it does not sting, the inchworm is gentle and serene.
The 64 squares are a violent place, and so the gentleness of the inchworm cannot be emulated in a game of Chess; but its characteristic movement can be imitated, and so we shall do.
In order to reach another square, whether by movement or capture, an inchworm piece needs to make two moves: the first stretches out to the new square, and the second consolidates the piece onto a single square.
The stretch may be a movement or a capture, but the consolidation can only be that: it cannot be a capture.
A stretched piece may retreat by consolidating back onto the square it first stretched from. Once it has done so, it has moved (twice, in fact); thus, it may neither make the Pawn's two-step move nor participate in Castling.
A stretched piece may be captured on either of the squares it occupies. Please notice that this means an attacked consolidated piece has no escape!
I interpret the en passant rule to mean that a consolidated Pawn that has just finished a two-step move may be captured e.p.
There is no obligation to consolidate a stretched piece.
With a White Rook on g1 and a Black K on h8, W to play may try Rg1-h1, but Black can respond with Kh8-g8, running away. If in response Rh1-g1, of course Kg8-h8. However, Black to play would be mated: Kh8-h7 Rg1-h1, both consolidate, checkmate.
Endgames with a small number of inchworm pieces sometimes are the same as normal endgames because the stretchings and consolidations can be sequenced.
There are many exceptions. In general, the weaker side loses more often. One reason is that a stretched piece is more vulnerable but a consolidated piece cannot escape, and the second reason is that although a stretched piece does not give check it is fatal for the King to consolidate onto the square it "covers" -- fatal, but legal, so the stalemate defense occurs less frequently (K+N+N versus K is a win).
1. e2-e4 d7-d5 2. e2-e4 d7-d5 3. e4xd5 Qd8xd5xe4 4. Nb1-c3 Qd5-d8
This sample game shows that you cannot manage to make the game seem like normal chess, even if both sides cooperate in sequencing the moves: 4...Qd8-d5 would have lost the Queen because an attacked piece has no escape. However, 4...Qd5-d8 has actually gained a tempo! Compared to book lines in FIDE Chess, Black has chosen an inferior line but has in compensation an extra move.
Inchworm movement appears to be value-preserving and so the author suggests that you ought to play Inchworm Chess with Different Armies.
Compared to Tirebiter Chess, Inchworm Chess is gentler and simpler, more playable and more likely to be played. Of course, since a game of Inchworm may take twice as many moves as a game of FIDE Chess, you would not choose to play it by mail nor by email.
A stretched piece cannot capture, and therefore is in two places at once but in one sense is nowhere at all. By being in two places, it threatens to consolidate onto either; and this threat was the reason that I chose to have consolidation done manually instead of allowing it to happen automatically next turn: one may have something more urgent to do than to consolidate, or one may wish to retain the flexibility of being stretched -- after all, a consolidated piece cannot flee from an attacker, but a stretched piece can do so.
In the forests of Pennsylvania one often sees an inchworm, but one never sees a Long Worm. This is easily explained.
The long worm is a fictional creature from a novel, "Dune", that was published in my youth. This novel had some cult following, and as a result the Long Worm became a monster in the game of Hack, around 1982 or so. Now its descendant is nethack, and there is no link here because of course you have www.nethack.org bookmarked already.
The Long Worm is unique. No other monster in Nethack occupies more than one position! How appropriate to today's theme...
The Long Worm is also unique because it comes in varying sizes, and if you attack a large one from the rear you may get a message "You cut off part of the long worm's tail!", and you find yourself fighting a smaller Long Worm.
Rule 3 is the key. "The half piece is not an inchworm piece."
The half piece is not an inchworm piece. Is a Halfling Queen worth less than an Inchworm Queen? Is it worth more? Who can say?
In Long Worm Chess, when you are about to capture half of your opponent's stretched piece, your mind will be suffused with a miasma of fear, doubt, and uncertainty. [2]
Seriously, the tension between the worth of the whole Inchworm piece and the direct-moving Half-Chess piece is the main point of the design of this game. Without rule 3, the idea would be worth mentioning but it would not be potentially a great game.
Yes. It should be played with different armies.
Problem. Half-pieces are not defined for all pieces in all standard armies. The choices must be agreed upon before the start of the game.
Each player has the normal number of pieces on the board at the start of the game, but controls a lineup which contains not only the Inchworm pieces that start the game but also the Half Chess pieces which may potentially appear.
In other words, each player has two different armies. For a game in which each player has four different armies, consider Archoniclastic Long Worm Chess. (You may have trouble doing so, since Archoniclastic Chess hasn't been written yet. Try anyway.)
In other words, each player has two different armies. Would it be so terrible if I started with the Inchworm Colorbound Clobberers and the Half Chess Nutty Knights? In a sense, it is terrible because it violates the metaphor of the piece being cut in half; but legally, it is legal.
[2] Suffused? Miasma? All I need to say is
"ichor" and you will think I have been rereading H.P. Lovecraft.
Submit this game to be available for rating!
For author and/or inventor information on this item see: this item's information page.
Created on: February 24, 2002. Last modified on: February 24, 2002.
Provide feedback on this page!
|
|
Last modified: Monday, December 22, 2008