Rookland is a remarkably rectangular island, with very straight streets, and the pieces that grow up there reflect this in their orthogonal style of play.
We found quite a few prospects, and came back with a complete team. We are pleased to introduce to you
This piece moves just like a FIDE Rook, but not quite as far. In fact, it gets tired after moving only four squares; for example, on an empty board it can run from a1 to a5 in one move, but then has to stop and rest.
The WD will almost always be developed to g3 and b3, which is fast and convenient; but it is then not yet on a useful square, because from g3 or b3 it does not attack the center.
However, from g3 or b3, it does threaten to go to g5 or b5, which may create an embarassing attack against g7 or b7. This is especially effective against the Fabulous Fide team (after the Bishop has been developed, of course).
Note: Imagine a pair of WD united on the seventh rank...
The HFD is worth a Rook, and is easy and fun to use.
Since the Chancellor (NR) is as strong as the FIDE-Queen, you might think the Rookies are too strong. In fact, the small material advantage they might have (if they have one) is compensated by a few positional factors.
In the opening, the clumsy development of the WD causes the Rookies a fair amount of difficulty, while the HFD is too easy to develop (and therefore gets into the game early at the risk of being exchanged for a N or a B); later on, simply because of the way Pawns work, there will be open files -- and the R4 may be forced to fight a defensive battle against the Rooks; in the endgame, perhaps the FIDE Queen is a bit stronger than the NR, although the NR has an incredible ability to give perpetual check and save the game.
In a more general sense, the overconcentration of power in one direction of motion weakens the team; instead of being able to surround a weak point and attack from many directions, the Rookies can [mostly] only line up against it in one direction. As pieces are exchanged off, this disadvantage becomes less important.
In this sample game, the short Rook is never used. This is good, because I have changed from R5 to R3 and back, before finally settling on R4 as the right one.
1. e2-e4 e7-e5 2. (HFD)f1-e2 Nb8-c6Notice that trying to play Petroff's Defense with 1...Ng8-f6 would be inadvisable.
White's next move looks good because it prevents the eventual Nc6-d4 (attacking the valuable HFD on e2), while preparing a Philidorean Pawn advance; although it gets a good game against almost all responses, it might not be the best.
3. c2-c3 d7-d5! 4. e4:d5 Qd8:d5If 4. d2-d3 f7-f5!? 5. e4:d5 is almost forced anyway; but 4. d2-d3 might be better than allowing the enemy Bishop to probe.
Or perhaps 5. d2-d3 (as follows in the sample game) is not good, and 5. (WD)g1-g3 is preferable.
5. d2-d3 Bc8-g4!? 6. f2-f3 Bg4-f5 7. (HFD)c1-d2 Qd5-d7 8. (WD)b1-b3 O-O-O 9. (WD)g1-g3 h7-h6!? 10. (WD)g3-e3 g7-g5!?If 9...Bf8-c5 10. (WD)g3-g5 is uncomfortable. Instead, Black tries to restrict White's pieces with h7-h6.
Now, if 10... Bf8-c5 11. (WD)e3:e5 Nc6:e5 12. (HFD)e2:e5 Bf5:d3 13. (HFD)e5:c5 Qd7-e7+ seems to win. However, 13. (HFD)e5:c5 is *check*!! (12...Re8 is also unpromising.)
Instead, 10...g7-g5 offers to trade e5 for d3 hoping that the Q will be strong on d3; and considering the alternative (Black follows with Bf8-g7 with permanent d-file pressure), we'll have White go for it.
11. (WD)e3:e5 Nc6:e5 12. (HFD)e2:e5 Bf5:d3 13. (WD)b3:d3 Qd7:d3 14. (NR)d1-f2 Qd3-a6 15. O-O-O Bf8-d6White notices that the HFD on d2 defends a2.
Black notices that 15...R:d2 16. (NR)f2:d2 Qa6:a2 17. (NR)d2-d8 is mate. Oops! Oh, no it isn't! That's a R4 on d1, not a full Rook!
White notices that 16...Bd6-f4 is going to make him unhappy, and decides that this is enough of a sample.
In retrospect, 6. f2-f3 was an error. With 6. (NR)d1-e3! Qd5-d7 (Not Qd5-e6? 7. (HFD)e2-e4!) 7. f2-f3 Bg4-f5 8. d2-d4 White can play more actively. Then, 8...O-O-O!? might get exciting.